Easier solution than the futile war on drugs is to let the government take a more aggressive take on it. If you really want to win the war, you have to either eliminate the supply (impossible), distribution (at best marginally effective), or demand.
If the federal government simply produced illegal drugs and sold them (covertly). They would sell it at a reduced price so the overseas producers go out of business and/or lose their profit. Ensure they had a slow acting poison that as only lethal after prolonged and repeated uses, you would essentially kill the demand. Roughly 90% would be dead in 18 months while the others who only used it recreationally would only get sick.
With little demand, the suppliers lose any profit and business dries up. The few remaining get off the junk out of fear of a tainted supply. What are they going to do?... say they got sick when they bought an illegal product? In the end, a little is lost but a lot is gained.
"Treasury throws founder of the Democratic Party off $20 bill, replaces with gun-toting Republican"
reply
share