I saw it as fluff entertainment, and still enjoy it for that reason. Siskel and Ebert dismissed it as racist schlock: Dark skinned neanderthal inferiors living and dwelling among an evil snow kingdom, led by a sexually repressed albino. Looking at it with more mature eyes, and having read the inspiration for the source material, I can see some truth to what they were saying, but it never struck me like that when I saw it as a young man. I just thought it was this cool sword and sorcery cartoon... though I did wonder why Larn was a half naked tan blonde. To me that seemed cliche and stupid, but more due to marketing pressures than an actual conscious story decision.
One gets the sense that these people wanted to make a Conan cartoon, but had neither the technology, nor the rights, to Conan, which was bought up by ... Universal Studios, I think.
All in all I liked it, and still enjoy it as a mindless entertainment. I mean, all these people wear are loin cloths and animal skins while running around in the cold? How seriously can you take it?
reply
share