'Worst Adapted Screenplay'


Too bad there isn't an Oscar category by that name, huh?

I really enjoyed the book (though everything else by John Irving that I've read, I consider to be better.)

Now, I knew up front that adapting a novel for film is pretty difficult sometimes, which is why almost every movie adaptation of a well-loved novel engenders fans who persist in saying, "...But the book is so much better!" Usually, I give such protestations short shrift. I tend to shirk them off with an attitude of "well, what were you expecting, anyway?"

The movie version of "Garp" is in a class all its own. This movie has to be one of the awfullest screenplays adapted from a novel of all time. Worst adapted screenplay" of any I've ever seen, that's for sure.

Lithgow as Roberta was everything it should have been. Everything else, though... Geez, the late Steve Tesich sure was in over his head with this one. Should've stuck with bicycling stories. The directing and editing left a lot to be desired, too, and the casting of Glenn Close was a horrible choice; just because she's a good actress in other roles doesn't mean she could ever have been believable as Jenny Fields.

"I don't deduce, I observe."

reply

I was not expecting so much hate of this film when I came to this board.

I have seen this movie about 3 times now and it is one of my favorites.That being said I have never read the book.

I have a completely different perspective and yeah, that may be all due to the fact I haven't read the book but that leaves to question what you might have though of the film had you not read the book first?

I suspect you may be putting down a film that is good in it's own right.
It may change things and leave things out from the source material but the film never felt empty or poorly constructed.It is certianly not the first adaptaion to stray from the source.

reply

The book is one of my favorite novels. I thoroughly enjoyed the film version. Yes, they made changes, but they had to in order for it to work as a film. Contrast this with "The Hotel New Hampshire", which was very faithful to the book, and it just didn't work as a film. Irving has this magical way of taking the most bizarre plots and making them seem, if not normal, at least relatable. "Garp" is an underrated film and probably as fine a film as could have been made from the book. And to the OP, who said that Glenn Close was miscast, apparently the Academy disagreed, as she was Oscar-nominated, and deservedly so.

"When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
... "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance"

reply

Oh no, trust me. If you think *that* is a bad adaptation of a novel, you should definitely check out the worst ever, which, ironically is also an "adaptation" of an Irving novel: A Prayer for Owen Meany.

I get that it's not the easiest book to adapt but what they made of it was... one of the worst preachiest stupid movies I've ever seen. Not only doesn't it retain anything from the book except Owen's physical difference and but it completely annihilates the entire theme of the book by turning the story into some kind of Christian miracle movie. It's so bad, they changed the name to Simon Birch.

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

I get that it's not the easiest book to adapt but what they made of it was... one of the worst preachiest stupid movies I've ever seen. Not only doesn't it retain anything from the book except Owen's physical difference and but it completely annihilates the entire theme of the book by turning the story into some kind of Christian miracle movie. It's so bad, they changed the name to Simon Birch.


Agreed, a million times. Seeing what they did to that book nearly sent me into a murderous rage and wanting to set the theater on fire.

I'm a big fan of John Irving--in my opinion, the translation of Garp from page to screen is quite a good one. It's a tough novel to get right for a movie and I think they got it mostly right.

reply