more drama than fact


The geologist was named Johnston (not Jackson), and besides Harry Truman most of the other characters are fictional. It would be nice to know which ones were actually part of that community.

reply

I got really annoyed when they made the Johnston/Jackson mistake. I rented the movie from netflix just to see how bad it was. It was horrible. There was no facts or anything. Of course like most disaster movies, they have to put romance in it.

Harry Truman had 20 cats living with him, where were the kitties in the movie huhhh? Yeah, thats what I thought. No kitties.

Lame movie. worst movie ever.

reply

Just the dog & puppies in the movie. I had no idea about Harry having cats in real life.

reply

The Johnston to Jackson change was intentional as too much was changed from the real David Johnston. Johnston was married, not a bachelor as depicted, and didn't fall in love with a women weeks before St Helens erupted. It was meant to be him, but they changed his character enough that pretty much had to change the last name. Some of the people in the movie were based upon real people or at composites of real people for dramatic purposes, names of course would be changed.
Harry Truman was pretty much as depicted other than the fact that he had many cats, and no dog.

reply

I am Dave Johnston's sister. The movie used Dave's name, but after viewing the movie, we told the producers to change the name because the character depicted in the movie was in no way, shape or form similar to my brother or his work. They dubbed "Jackson" over Johnston. By the way, Dave was never married.

reply

Saying it doesn't match his personal life, sure I can see the change, but was he not a geologist? You said it didn't depict his work right? I thought he was doing the job as depicted? Harry Truman's sister consulted the movie and said he knew David.

reply

The fictional changes made in the movie weren't "mistakes." As has been said, the name of the geologist was changed because of dramatic license being taken with the story. When you use a real person but change too many things, you risk being sued. Changing the name (even to something very close and thus recognizable), eliminates that risk.

As for Harry Truman being shown with dogs instead of cats, I can only assume it was done because cats are notoriously difficult to work with in dramatic situations. They aren't trainable like dogs are. Any cat owner knows they do pretty much what they want, and movie directors don't like that. At least they showed Harry Truman as the animal lover he was, instead of completely eliding that element of his personality.

It's been a while since I've seen it, but I remember liking "St. Helens" a lot. It wasn't the greatest movie ever made, but it was better than a lot of people give it credit for.

reply

Yep, I can just imagine the fun they might have had trying to herd 20 cats around on cue.

reply

it wasn't a "mistake" it was deliberate. They often change the actual names of people in movies, and that way they don't have to be 100% accurate!

reply

Harry was a stubborn, mean old cuss who didnt care less about animals....or he would have made sure they were safe even if HE wanted to stay.

reply

My 6th grade class has a boxful of cards under all that mud that we'd made for Harry. I was out fishing when it happened. We heard what we thought was thunder, and I am terrified of electrical storms (we seldom have thunderstorms like the rest of the planet knows them). Pretty soon my mom shows up screaming for us to get in the car. We weren't done fishing, and she screams that the mountain blew and they're re-routing traffic off I-5 down hwy.101, through our way. Being on the coast, we didn't get ashfall, but our relatives east of us did, describing the blackness, the lightning, the choking heat and ash. Our class had JUST been up to camp Cispus in the mountains just weeks before. My mother almost didn't let me go because the volcano was active. Very vivid memories here...east of the mountain you still find large amounts of ash, too.

reply

It was truly amazing. I'm from Lynnwood, but I was in Minnesota when it blew the 1st time. I was watching the sun beginning to set, and it was actually still quite high up in the sky. There wasn't a cloud to be seen, and they sky was so blue. The sun began to disappear, first in the middle, then the right, then the left, right in the sky. I was terrified because I couldn't see any clouds or anything covering it! I heard later about Mt. St. Helen's blowing. I came home on a Greyhound, and as we passed through Ritzville, it was as dark as night, during the day, from the ash still floating around, and I saw people walking around with masks over their faces. I was home the 2nd time it blew, and I saw the mushroom cloud from the front door and heard the loud booms. I'll never forget it. It was surprising that there was more ash to the East than there was in Seattle.. in fact, I forgot to mention, the next morning in MN, there was a light dusting of ash all over the cars!

reply

Lived in Forest Grove here, but I was born in Richland, five years after. Still I grew up hearing the stories, and Mount Saint Helens has always fascinated me. In fact, when I go back home to visit next month, I plan to spend three days camping there. It has been 13 years since I last saw her up close, and ever since I took this job in China, over a year since I saw her from a distance.

"From a phylogenetic perspective, we are all fish!"

reply