Woman of color?
I just watched this film for the first time since it premiered in 1981. While I still think it is an awesome film with fantastic performers, I just saw something that struck me as a bit ridiculous. In the scene where Coalhouse Walker, Jr. (Howard Rollins) comes up to the house where Sarah (Debbie Allen) is staying, he asks for her by saying to James Olson's character "I'm looking for a woman of color." I believe the setting for this film is supposed to be 1906, the year of the infamous Stanford White murder. I don't think anyone in the United States had ever heard of the term "woman of color," let alone used it to refer to an African-American. I'm sure African-Americans didn't even use it to refer to themselves. I would guess the "nice" terms were "colored" or even "negro" and we all know what the pejoritive was. Why would this term be used in a film that took place in 1906?
As an African-American myself, I am in no way making a racist commentary here. I just think it was a silly and rather cowardly decision on Milos Forman's part (or perhaps on the part of one of the producers or writers) to allow Rollins' character to say "woman of color." Was the studio afraid to use the historically correct term here because it didn't want to be accused of being racist and/or making a polically incorrect word? There was other dialogue in the script that I thought was very offensive to African-Americans but nonetheless accurate for the early 1900's. Was this just a cop-out by the studio execs or what? Remember 1906 wasn't that long after the end of slavery in America. It would seem to me just as ridiculous for Robert Reed's character in "Roots" to refer to Kunta Kinte as "a man of color." If anyone knows why this dialogue decision was made, I'd be very interested to know the answer. I just love films and I hate to see a film where this is an obvious historical inaccuracy in the script or storyline, even if it's not PC.