Quest for Water?


I get that fire was very necessary but . . . so is/was water. There didn't seem to be much interest in H2O . . . and I would have thought that might have been just a bit important too.

reply

fire meant surviving you could survive freezing temperature.you could cook the meat and kill bacteries,the food would have a better taste so you would it more and have more calories in your body developing your muscular and mental capacities.fire was a source of light at night so you didn,t depend on the cycle day and night you could continue your work at night.fire would make weapons made of wood stronger so the hunting of animal would be more efficient.sitting around a fire would encourage social behaviour and communication.water on the other hand was much more easy to get you can get it from a river a lake from rain and at that time the word polution didn,t exist

reply

Well, they had access to lots of water, so it wasn't much of an issue.

reply

Water doesn't go out, and then you have no more for months, possibly years.

reply

Their tribe seemed to practically live in a marsh so for these people water wasn't an issue. I'm sure they could make a Quest for Water film set in a different region during the prehistoric era.

reply

Quest for Water would be a 5 minute movie.

reply

Wasn't there water everywhere?

reply

QUEST FOR WATER:

Caveman walks downhill from his cave to the pond they live by.

THE END

Now, this is a signature gun, and that is an optical palm reader.

reply

Hi there! Inspired by my choice? 😋

reply

Yes, actually. Haven't seen it for years but you reminded me of how funky and cool QFF is, so I thought I'd peruse their board.

Now, this is a signature gun, and that is an optical palm reader.

reply

Hehe! But you know, isnt it crazy? That there is only one single film in history that wants to take the subject more or less naturalistic/accurate/nonhollywoods"? One brave attempt, if we dont include the Daryl Hannah film and the Raquel Welch film....

reply