MovieChat Forums > Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981) Discussion > Why'd they freak over a topless 16 year ...

Why'd they freak over a topless 16 year old...?


Brooke shields literally did several full frontal nude scenes at age 12 just a few years prior.
And there's other examples of underage nudity around the same time.
I don't get it. There's way worse stuff.

reply

Well, to be fair, there are those who think underage nudity is bad regardless of the context. I personally am a bit offended by it too. I really don't think I should see anyone but my future wife naked.

reply

Your FUTURE wife? Goodness gracious me. Surely nothing before marriage and even then with the lights off, curtains drawn and your eyes shut.

reply

It's what I believe in as a Christian. I wouldn't expect you nonbelievers to understand.

reply

I'm not a Christian, but I have to admit I'm sickened by the mainstream's bigoted reaction to any Christian ideal. You want to wait for marriage, good for you.

reply

Alan, while it's true that some religionists are Victorian about erotic matters, even between spouses, you're uninformed or misinformed about Judeo-Christian romance, marriage & sex plainly observed in the biblical model of the topic, the Song of Songs by King Solomon, which features smoldering hot romance and marital sex between a man and woman. And the lights ain't off, bruh. It's relatively short at eight chapters in poetic verse and can be read in about 12-15 minutes. Here it is to read with your own eyes, if you're interested: https://biblescripture.net/Song.html

reply

I dont believe Brooke Shields did any full frontal nudity.

In the infamous Louis Malle movie Pretty Baby her body was obscured and shot in a way that you never actually saw her nude.

And in Blue Lagoon she wore a skimpy bikini but there was no nudity.

reply

Yeah. Half the time there's nudity in films it's not the actress but some other person that does the nudity. For instance, Mila Kunis doesn't actually show off her butt in Friends and Benefits. That's some other woman that they had do the scene. It's probably like that in a lot of other films too.

reply

Virgin! lol

reply

What's wrong with me being a virgin!? If aything it means I have standards! Something a lot of people don't have! Seriously, you're lucky this is a message board or I'd kick you!

reply

Nothing is wrong with it. I wish I could have lost my virginity to someone who actually mattered to me rather than to the school whore. That's on me- not her.

reply

Okay. Sorry.

reply

You're pathetic lol

reply

1. It's gross.
2. There is a difference between seeing a nude kid and a nude kid having sex
3. It didn't seem to do Marta Kober any favors. Just look her up.
4. You're right that other movies of the time had nudity for underage actors. Caddy shack had a scene with a kid being pantsed. Still gross.
5. Does it actually make a movie better? We live in a time where anything is put on screen and it's available for everyone to stream. While visually it's gotten better due to technology, the actual stories are in par with soap operas of the 80's and 90's. People get excited for shows like Game of Thrones, Stranger things, The Walking Dead, American Horror Story, True Blood, Battlestar Galactica, etc... Yet the shows follow the stupid Soap Opera style of writing and they end up having disappointing endings. Nudity in many of those shows is just a ploy to distract and keep people watching a lame story. It's a gimmick... Just like it was in Friday the 13th.

reply

"Its gross"
Stopped reading right there

reply

Glad you agree.

reply

Friday the 13th is arguably one of the few horror series where sex/nudity isn't pointless...

reply

Lol. If you're that passionate about sex and nudity, that your deal. I'm just fine with #6 which has no nudity and the sex is just people in their clothes bouncing for a sec.

reply

You know sex is the reason you exist

reply

Yeah and It would be disgusting to watch my mom and dad bump uglies.

Just like watching teens do the same, it's gross.

reply

Yeah a hot 16 year old girl in her prime is disgusting, am I right?

reply

Yep.

Here's your crush today.


https://crimeinformer.com/arrestArticle/Oregon/109904

reply

Well now see you're proving my point

reply

And you're still missing the real point. You're advocating for the sexual exploitation of a child. Gross.

reply

Pray tell, what age is ok to begin sexual exploitation then?

reply

No age if it's exploitation.

reply

I get it, you like to think of little girls as sexual objects. Good luck with that. I hope you stay far away from any school.

reply

Big boobs= not a little girl.
Simple as that.

reply

Please stay away from schools. You'll be doing yourself and the kids a big favor.

reply

Please stop repeating tired NPC phrases and try thinking for yourself

reply

Says the guy wanting to look at naked teens having sex. Enjoy the registry.

reply

NPC

reply

Pedo

reply

Idiot

reply

Men have their prime from 14-17

reply

A kid?!?! 16 year olds aren’t kids in any sense of the word.

reply

You are aware that in the U.S you don't graduate highschool til you are 17 or 18, right? And whether you like it or not you aren't considered an adult in the U.S til you are 18. Also in my state of Illinois the smoking age is 21. Though I didn't vote for any of the people who did that.

reply

Biology and laws are two different things. Regardless, she was a teen. Not a kid. Kids are 12 and under.

reply

Can you really not understand that a teenage girl having sex with a teenage boy could lead to her getting pregnant? And being in highschool and pregnant is not a good thing. And don't tell me about condoms. Pregnancy is still a risk even with those. It really feels like you and the TC have no common sense. Then again you seem to act like anyone 13 or older should be considered an adult.

reply

I didn’t say anything about sex. And I said they were teens, not adults.

reply

I'd still consider teenagers kids. I have a 14 year old nephew who I would consider a kid.

reply

Because she’s a minor you sicko. That’s why. You need to be on one sort of list…

reply

16 is legal in many US states, you ignoramus

reply

[deleted]

Just because you’re some sort of sick weirdo, doesn’t entitle you to call names. Hope you’re not around kids..

reply

I know it's difficult, but you need to cope with reality.

reply

Your reality of looking at underage girls naked is wrong and you need some serious help. Seriously.. you are a sick individual.

reply

16 is age of consent in over half of the United States
You delusional moron.

reply

AGE OF CONSENT HAS LITTLE TO DO WITH WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU AND HOW UNFIXABLE IT IS.

reply

Sorry, I'm not into old grannies like you

reply

It's 17 in my state of Illinois.

reply

You call him a name first. 😄

reply

Not only was she topless, but I believe is was a sex scene.

In the US, that would put it in the child pornography category.

reply

What 16 year old? Weren't all the "teens" in the Friday the 13th movies actually adults?

reply

Nah, the girl who was killed banging her man was underage.

reply

I believe they thought she was legally an adult.

I believe them when they say they were fooled. I'm sure they could have found an attractive adult to play the part. They really didn't have anything to gain by casting someone underage in the part.

reply

It should be illegal. You think posting nude kids online should be ok?

reply

Parents and rost

reply