MovieChat Forums > Dynasty (1981) Discussion > What went wrong with DYNASTY ? (Season b...

What went wrong with DYNASTY ? (Season by season)


** SPOILERS! **

Season 1:

The ongoing saga of Denver oil tycoon Blake Carrington and his family (a show the ABC network hopes will compete with CBS's DALLAS, easily the biggest program on earth in 1980).

A somber drama at first, the torments of Krystle, Steven, and Claudia are center stage. The acting is good, and so is the writing. Bill Conti's score and theme add poignant grandeur to the pilot. The pacing is a bit slower than may be required to become a smash hit, but the groundwork for the series is being nicely laid (or is it "lain"?). No, the glitz and glamour aren't anywhere near as flashy as they would later become, but in some ways they're deeper; someone once described Season 1 of DYNASTY as being "all cabernet and dark chocolates and mahogany" and while that might be a slight exaggeration, it's easy to understand the sentiment: the middleclass Blaisdel family may be getting more screen time than some viewers may appreciate, but the Carringtons would never feel more legitimately "rich": the interiors of the mansion are brooding and believable, life on the estate has a certain rarefied flavor, the cultural observations and literary references are convincing of a family bred if not necessarily well.

All the plots nicely coalesce to bring the season to a natural, tragic and fated climax as Blake goes on trial for killing his son's gay lover, resulting in, in the final frame, the arrival of his ex-wife, Alexis, to testify as a hostile witness for the prosecution.


Season 2:

The decision (at first wisely) is made to speed up the pacing and add some glamour to DYNASTY to turn the series, which barely survived the cancellation axe after Season 1, into a bona fide hit. (To be fair, it was against M*A*S*H that brief first year).

Joan Collins seems perfectly cast as Blake's gorgeous and morally challenged ex-wife, with Blake's and Alexis' bitching about why they divorced so intriguing because the viewer suspects they're both largely telling the truth about the other.

Collins captures exactly the Mysterious Slut elements the role requires, and, as an added bonus, it turns out that she and Linda Evans' Krystle seem to display a pitch-perfect adversarial chemistry on-screen. While you can't write that sort of chemistry, you can write to it, which the series initially does masterfully.

And having the nasty ex-wife living three feet from the mansion in her petit trianon was inspired, giving her essentially the run of the new wife's house, much to the latter's frustration.

There's a little bit of the late-'70s TV mini-series odor to Season 2 of DYNASTY. I think of it every time I see the wonderful cobweb-strewn night scene between Alexis and butler Joseph in her darkened art studio, or Alexis' foreboding "reading" from her Rome clairvoyant, or Alexis' references to brawling with an unnamed Oscar-winning actress, or Blake's European villa-hopping to save his oil business and harassment by the faceless Logan Rhinewood ... The past seems real, palpable, if not necessarily present: the secrets, the shadows, the series' National Enquirer tone...

The casting helps immeasurably somehow. Even the ones who may not be the most brilliant of thespians seem nonetheless perfect for their roles.

Because of the increasingly frenetic feeling over Season 2, enhanced by Ben Lazarone's campily operatic score in the latter part of the year, one could easily overlook how this seemingly pell mell lack of structure in fact obscures brilliant structure... Whether this is the accomplishment of new writers/consultants Bob & Eillen Pollock, or line producer Ed Ledding (Ledding was the only Season 2 staffer not with the show in Season 3) is an open question, but Ed de Blasio's equally operatic dialogue is every bit as effective as it still gives legitimate character drive to the bitchy barbs.

Even the poorly edited art studio catfight (then a shock to see the two leading ladies of a television series duke it out) worked, more-or-less, because it seemed like a kitschy anomaly, and grew naturally out of the conflict (and it was the last time the show's soon-to-be-infamous physical slapdowns ever would). And the trendsetting wardrobe was still not so outrageous as to seem excessive or silly.

The finale to Season 2 would, in retrospect, become something of the entire series' spiritual peak, the ride on horseback that Blake and Krystle would take up Scorpio Peak at Sky Crest with Blake left dangling on the precipice somehow metaphorical. It was a key cliffhanger in many more ways than one.

It looked like DYNASTY was going to become the best TV show ever made... and even Warren Beatty quite-improbably called up executive producer, Aaron Spelling, after the Season 2 finale aired and said, "You have the best show on television!"

It's been said (perhaps by me) that if melodrama aims dead-center for the cliche, then you may actually come up with something wonderful, because you find that the cliche (contrary to its reputation) is actually rarely tapped into or perfected. If true, DYNASTY achieved this balance beautifully in Season 2.

If one looks today at the old Nielsen ratings charts, one might not realize how big DYNASTY had already become. Because the ratings from early in the season (before most people had discovered the show) are averaged in to those from the latter part of the year, the final rating for the 1981/82 season only places DYNASTY at 19th place... Not bad, certainly (especially for an era when the three American networks dominated, with little competition from cable or home video, and none from the Internet) yet still not reflective of how huge the series had already become by the end of Season 2, when it had jumped up near the top of the weekly charts and had, for all intents and purposes, become the most talked about show on the air.

Without question, it's the year that put DYNASTY on the map, and the year the show was always trying, however incompetently, to get back to.



Season 3:

Despite Beatty's congratulatory call the previous Spring, Aaron Spelling phoned series creators Richard & Esther Shapiro (who'd only been peripherally involved with Season 2, leaving their pals, Bob & Eileen Pollock to guide the plots) and asked the Shapiros to come back, claiming that DYNASTY was "spiraling out of control." Never a producer seemingly concerned much with quality, "out of control" likely meant money to Spelling. Once the Shapiros had returned, line producer Ed Ledding was gone. And whatever his contribution may have been, with Ledding now absent, the polish and freshness and cohesive cleverness of the previous season is gone as well. Almost completely.

The remaining producers apparently decided if their amping it up a little for season 2 had benefitted the series, then throwing all legitimate storytelling to the wind would be even better. So they further changed the tone of their burgeoning hit show, DYNASTY now taking on a kind of nervous, bourgeois smallness instead.

Immediately, the writing starts to go awry: things don't make sense, non-sequiturs abound, the plotting becomes an afterthought, events are random, narrative cohesion is minimal... Also, the misguided new Static Acting Directive from the producers damages the performances, unnecessarily ruining the feel of many scenes; this new directive seems designed to make the already-poised actors seem even more poised (yet did the opposite) while any narrative logic in the scripts is tossed out the window, with too much dialogue given over to hyperbolic love/hate repartee (and the characters telling each other how fabulous they are) substituting for any kind of focus or flow to the stories... At once, all the characters become equidistant from one another, appear to know each other equally well as if they're all watching DYNASTY every Wednesday evening; they now mostly speak in interchangeable dialogue with individual perspective minimized.

For whatever reason, one scene which for me epitomizes the series' new disorientation is the foolish exchange in the new conservatory set between Blake and Krystle about why they can't go on a second honeymoon because Krystle needs more than 90 days to apologize to her ex, Mark Jennings, for her unfriendliness after Alexis and Fallon tricked him into leaving New York for Denver... Or Krystle's accusation that Blake had hired Jennings as a tennis pro for the dreary-beyond-words La Mirage Hotel in order to punish her in some way, even though, given the place Krystle and Blake are in their relationship at this point, such an accusation seems strangely "retro" at best, the writers grasping at straws.

Gone is any warranted cynicism about wealth and the wealthy, replaced with a dreadful, fawningly '80s "rich-people-are-good/poor-people-are-horrible" mindset. And every corner of the show is now infected, condoning the Carringtons' snobbery.

There is also no longer any sense of location. Any attempts to recreate Colorado, even thru the use of stock footage, are essentially non-existent. The show could now occur anywhere.

Yes, the introduction of snarling, long-lost son Adam (well-cast with Gordon Thomson) and his vaguely incestuous relationship with mother Alexis was a good thing, and the defining storyline of the season. But even that is lessened by the fact that Alexis has been transformed overnight from the grasping and manipulative socialite she was the previous season to brilliant Empress of Industry, with no transition period shown at all. Now that she is the just-add-water Queen of the Planet, she no longer has to purr and scheme and deceive; she simply openly insults and bitches everybody out in every scene, removing the sense of intelligence and mystery she once displayed and, likewise, any sense of her enigmatic back story. She's just a spoiled cow now. Only a cow dressed in fur.

Other new characters are added, but the worst may be the re-casting of troubled occasionally-gay Steven. Al Corley, frustrated by the network's suppression of Steven's sexuality, left the show at the close of Season 2, and the role is re-cast mid-way thru Season 3 with the pinched, tight-jawed presence of Jack Coleman who delivers all his lines through his teeth. It renders Steven's tortured journey irrelevant, as does the writing for him, as his ventures into homoeroticism for the next several years will consist of the rare long, blank glance at the odd nerdy male (that's how you know who's gay) and marrying a succession of women with whom he will remain involved in some capacity long after divorcing them. (And, for those too young to remember: no, this wasn't a step forward even in the '80s).

And Fallon, once a spoiled, sassbox wonder, is de-ovaried and takes on domestic and hotelier duties with resigned placidity. She also decides spontaneously that her dreaded stepmother is wonderful after all.

But the biggest loss is what happens to Krystle, the golden heroine once so soulfully played by Linda Evans. Krystle had at one time provided the moral voice for this show now so contemptuous of such perspective. With the downturn in the writing in season 3, the actors' simultaneous restraint into excessive physical rigidity, and the loss of the producers' interest in anything not reflective of Reagan's smugly mercenary value system, Krystle quickly becomes a vapid and saccharine Stepford wife and exactly the goody-goody Alexis had always (and once unjustly) accused her of. And Evans' performance suffers pointedly: her clear-eyed countenance now increasingly replaced with a cross-eyed squealing of her lines... Just as Vivien Leigh was born to play Scarlett O'Hara, Linda Evans and Joan Collins seemed born to play Krystle and Alexis (as Season 2 gives most vivid evidence). They were perfect casting. Yet as the Good Queen is neglected and trivialized in Season 3 and beyond, the Bad Queen also suffers: Alexis no longer has a valid, statured, female partner with whom to spar.

The balance of the show is now badly off.

By Season 3, it seems clear that the show-runners have developed several strange and misguided ideas about what it is about DYNASTY that makes it work or will make it "better." Regardless, thanks to the clothes, a cast with incredible Q-ratings, and a Spelling/ABC publicity machine keeping the show in the press on a daily basis, the Nielsen numbers will remain mile high for another couple of years.


Season 4:

The 1983/84 year is sometimes cited as the peak season for the wealth-based nighttime soaps of the '80s. And DYNASTY, mentioned even by the Reagans and Princess Diana as a fashion influence, has already changed the cultural vernacular, the word "bitch" taking on a semi-complimentary connotation for the first time (thanks to Alexis, although balancing her villainy with her newly-acquired role model status as a powerful boardroom fixture won't be easy) and even the term "dynasty" -- previously invoked mostly in the context of ancient empires -- is now being used with much greater frequency to describe contemporary families of power. But the electrifying media coverage of DYNASTY is becoming more gripping than the show itself. The goofy, stilted problems from the previous season continue, the characters increasingly lobotomized.

The very first episode of the year is really quite taut and focused (it really is!), but it's all downhill from there: Joseph commits suicide after trying to kill Alexis, but the show never fully explains why he set fire to Steven's cabin with her inside it. We know it has something to do with Alexis holding secrets about Kirby's mother --- but what? She was crazy, we already know that... No matter. After Kirby makes a lame attempt at strangling Alexis, the butler's orphaned daughter agrees to marry her rapist, Adam... Then the show initiates a promising plotline about someone stalking Alexis and ransacking her penthouse suite, yet that plot is dropped and forgotten without explanation... Who was doing it??... Claudia weds Steven so Blake can't take away his child in court, then the couple promptly forgets it was a marriage of convenience... Fallon gets taken in by a slimy slice of Eurotrash, Peter DeVilbis, inexplicably cast with the corpse-like Helmut Berger whose lines appear to be dubbed or shoulda been. When she realizes she's been had by this nasally mumbling opportunist, she runs into traffic and gets one of those Carrington Family Headaches the show seems so fond of; in fact, the headaches get so bad, she suddenly realizes she's loved Jeff Colby all along and wants to remarry him for no convincing reason... Blake's public-relations girl, Tracy Kendall, decides the way to get back at Krystle for taking the promotion she's hoped for is to seduce Krystle's husband in the most lazily-staged, pathetically transparent attempts imaginable... Alexis gets a new boyfriend, the effetely macho Dex Dexter, who just waltzes into her office, lays a kiss on her, and they're together forever! Only their relationship will never make any sense... The cast actually goes to film in Denver for the only time in the series' history, but it remains inside the entire time, ignoring the opportunity to obtain any exterior location footage whatsoever... Diahann Carroll shows up at the end of the year to make a now-obligatory Mysterious Entrance, and she never gets anything else to do for the next three years except hand her brother, Blake, the occasional check to "save my company, dammit!" as she's apparently now his banker.

Nothing goes anywhere. The writers no longer seem to have a story they feel compelled to tell.

At least Alexis briefly takes on a sultry, smoky-voiced sense of her own statured coolness for Season 4, causing her to seem like the only person in the Rocky Mountains who might have even a clue as to what she's actually doing --- although her spontaneous Dietrich solo routine in a cowboy bar to seal some nonsensical oil deal doesn't go far in proving it.

Oh, how good this show seemed to be a just couple of years earlier! For it is unrecognizable now. Only the diamonds and cashmere are of acceptable quality.

Reportedly, the actors have started to complain behind the scenes about all these problems, but the producers tell them "just look at the ratings" to shut them up.

Pamela Sue Martin sized up the problem very succinctly by saying that DYNASTY started out as a witty satire of the rich and famous, but quickly deteriorated into a lame celebration of same. So she left.

Despite the problems, DYNASTY continues to get near-universal praise in the American press, paralleling the Emperor's New Clothes (in this case, literally, but in reverse) "teflon" immunity enjoyed by the Reagan presidency. The show is not just coming to reflect (and be reflected by) the values of the 1980's, it's also reflecting the Denial.




...to be continued

reply

Season 6-7 got to be ridiculous.I never understood why they had the baby that Krystale never spends time with. She cares more about the welfare of Blake than the child. The writers never developed a story line around that fact. Krystale interaction with the baby is not motherly in the least,more like a distant relative.

reply

Yes, the show had become disoriented.

--

The most profound of sin is tragedy unremembered.

reply

Not true there was the heart transplant story with the amazing emmy worthy performance from cassie Yates

reply

Yes, S7 was the dregs.

--

The most profound of sin is tragedy unremembered.

reply

Last half of season 7 is the absolute bottom.

I'd rather watch a Karen Cellini best-of reel repeated for 24 hours straight than having to suffer through the absolute bullsh-t of that EVER again.

reply

Ha! Yes, pretty much.

--

The most profound of sin is tragedy unremembered.

reply

I enjoyed reading your piece, PrometheusTree64. I'm watching season 7 now on Youtube. While I agree with everything you have to say about the show, there are moments in certain episodes that set this show apart from its rivals. (At least these moments are memorable to me!) Most of them involve Diahann Carroll when she's singing, especially that bouncy number she did at La Mirage ("I Got You Under My Skin'.) If only the show were always this exciting! Sadly, Ms. Carroll was under-utilized and the contretemps involving Dominique remained largely uninteresting.

The chemistry between Linda Evans and John Forsythe was priceless but I think their scenes together were watered down by Evans' stiff posturing; like she's was always posing for a spread for Architectural Digest. Both were at their finest in the scene in the hospital room filled with balloons (following the car mishap). Yet Forsythe's one scene with Pat Crowly (as Emily) at the cemetery was stronger and much more memorable, and real.

Joan Collins seemed to dominate the latter part of season 6 and season 7 and she was actually quite touching when she expressed her heartbreak after having caught Dex and Amanda together in bed. But so flamboyant were her outfits, she seemed like the Queen from Outerspace throwing a tantrum. In contrast, Samantha Jo,a favorite character of mine, was the least self-conscious character in the show.

The show's sets are opulent but somehow shot in a way that makes me feel claustrophobic. The few outdoor shots they have seem sloppily edited and have the feel of an early 1970s Aaron Spelling TV movie.

And still, when Diahann Carroll began crooning and the society orchestra started playing at the lavish balls, Dynasty made me forget about its earthier, more realistic rivals!

reply

I agree that Diahann Carroll's moments where she sang were a highlight on the show. She had talent that most of the other cast members lacked. She could do bitchy comedy, heart wrenching drama and musical scenes.

Personally, I think Dominique defines the show more than any other character-- because she is the outsider who should be an insider-- this is her family, her town, and she has to fight for a rightful place within the dynasty.

reply

I enjoyed reading your piece, PrometheusTree64.

Thank you, markedjuan!


The chemistry between Linda Evans and John Forsythe was priceless but I think their scenes together were watered down by Evans' stiff posturing; like she's was always posing for a spread for Architectural Digest.

Yes, although that was due to the static acting directive implemented by producers around Season 3 (she's much more natural in S1 & S2) which always effects the nice blonde woman first and most profoundly, turning her into a Stepford Wife.

--
LBJ's mistress tells all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

[deleted]

i'm on season 5. the show is getting better with each season. i can't wait to see what happens in season 6

reply

Though I aprreciate reading your season to season reviews, I can't help but feel that you put too much effort in trying to see something less than trash in a soap opera. So what if the Krystle and Rita plot is laughable? I still enjoyed it because this is a soap opera and not a drama.

reply

Though I aprreciate reading your season to season reviews, I can't help but feel that you put too much effort in trying to see something less than trash in a soap opera. So what if the Krystle and Rita plot is laughable? I still enjoyed it because this is a soap opera and not a drama.


Folks often make that argument...

But it still requires getting the balance right (as Season 2 did nicely) and the series' quick slide into not just "trash" but poor storytelling by any measure is what caused the ratings to begin crashing at a near-record rate (between 1985 and 1987, DYNASTY underwent one of the fastest two-year drops in the Nielsen ratings in history for a former #1 show).

So it does matter: there's good trash, and then there's trash that just doesn't work. And DYNASTY rapidly became the latter with a vengeance.

John Forsythe once said in an interview about DYNASTY that, "audiences can tell when there's something wrong with the scripts and the stories, and they lose interest in the project."

It's not about having delusional artistic aspirations for a show, but just asking for a decent story reasonably well told, even if it's kinda crazy.

And if you don't deliver that, the viewers leave.

The last year of the show, guided by a different producer, was pretty darned good, but it was much too late the save the series.

--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

The Krystle/Rita storyline would have worked (and has worked) on daytime soaps, but not in primetime. It was too far-fetched and went on too long, but had it been on daytime soaps, it would have worked. I believe at the time, the writers at the time were running out of ideas for the characters, so they "borrowed" some stories from daytime soaps.

Falcon Crest did the same thing. In 1985, One Life to Live had a multiple personality disorder storyline in which the show's heroine, Victoria Lord Buchanan, the rich, proper newspaper publisher had an alternate personality, Nikki Smith, a trashy, slutty bad girl. The storyline won (Erika Slezak) one of her many Daytime Emmys. Falcon Crest literally stole that storyline the same year in 1985 AFTER OLTL aired its story. They had Jordan Roberts (played by Morgan Fairchild), a proper upstanding attorney who developed a an alternate personality, Monica Smith, a trashy, slutty bad girl. The only difference is that Jordan's multiple personality disorder was the result of childhood molestation by her own father, while (at the time), OLTL didn't go there. The writers wanted to, but ABC turned them down, and it wasn't until 10 years later in 1995, did they reveal that Viki's multiple personality disorder was due to childhood molestation by her own father.

reply

Although I'd argue that almost any plotline, no matter how crazy, is doable -- but its success all depends on the execution.

They say the Krystle/Rita doppelganger storyline no longers looks all that bad today when it's all over in two weeks in syndication (or two days on DVD marathon viewing) but in 1985/86 it took four months and was excruciating, to say nothing of boring.

And while I'm basically against far-fetched stuff like evil twins and UFO abductions, the fact is that you could do them if you bother to execute them properly.

The flip side of that is that even the most grounded, pedestrian, reality-based business or domestic plot can fail when it's stupidly done.

Even "soap" or "camp" or "trash" has rules: you need to tell your story in a somewhat compelling fashion, no matter how wacky.

Two of the best examples of "trash" done well is DYNASTY's Season 2 and FALCON CREST's Season 2 & 3. They have a shaky narrative at times, but sheer focus, goodish acting, and an overall sense of chutzpah totally sell them.

Afterwards, producer changes (the best ones being dropped from both shows, interestingly) just turned them into kitschy melodramas whose "outrageousness" didn't come off very effectively.



--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

Season one of Dynasty would actually fit on cable today - it's smart, sharp, edgy and intelligent.

Season two of Dynasty is the best one - it takes what worked with season one and adds that mainstream quality to it.

Season three of Dynasty... it's still good for me, it becomes a bit Soap 101 though with Adam and stuff like the Poison Paint plot (ha! allitteration!).

Season four of Dynasty is dreary. Sorry, I loathe it, I did like Dominique coming with all guns a-blazin' at the end of the season, too bad she fizzled out.

Season five is silly. I remember that weird plot with Jeff and Nicole Simpson (unfortunate name) going on some treasure hunt, but at least we got Amanda, who I liked.

Season six is my favourite season next to one and two - it's like they let everything go and just went hot ass mess. I laugh watching this season and it's a good quality for me.

Season seven is HORRID. Sorry, there's no other way to describe it. Awful, especially the retooled second part. Why?

Season eight is at least consistent and tries to have an storyarc that stretches for the entire season. It's a bit dull, but it pulls back on some of the worst habits of the show at that point.

Season nine revitalises the show and makes it interesting again. Adding Sable is a genuis decision and believe it or not, pulling back Alexis a bit makes it easier to breathe.

I don't and won't ever acknowledge "The Reunion". It doesn't exist.

reply

Great analysis, paranoja!

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

reply

Season one of Dynasty would actually fit on cable today - it's smart, sharp, edgy and intelligent.

Season two of Dynasty is the best one - it takes what worked with season one and adds that mainstream quality to it.

Season three of Dynasty... it's still good for me, it becomes a bit Soap 101 though with Adam and stuff like the Poison Paint plot (ha! allitteration!).

Season four of Dynasty is dreary. Sorry, I loathe it, I did like Dominique coming with all guns a-blazin' at the end of the season, too bad she fizzled out.

Season five is silly. I remember that weird plot with Jeff and Nicole Simpson (unfortunate name) going on some treasure hunt, but at least we got Amanda, who I liked.

Season six is my favourite season next to one and two - it's like they let everything go and just went hot ass mess. I laugh watching this season and it's a good quality for me.

Season seven is HORRID. Sorry, there's no other way to describe it. Awful, especially the retooled second part. Why?

Season eight is at least consistent and tries to have an storyarc that stretches for the entire season. It's a bit dull, but it pulls back on some of the worst habits of the show at that point.

Season nine revitalises the show and makes it interesting again. Adding Sable is a genuis decision and believe it or not, pulling back Alexis a bit makes it easier to breathe.

I don't and won't ever acknowledge "The Reunion". It doesn't exist.


That sums it up nicely, paranoja.

--

reply

I never thought they showed all rich people as good and poor people as bad. To me Alexis, Adam, Ben, and Dex were chaotic evil with no chance at any redemption. Joseph, Kirby Claudia, Stephen and Jeff were true good people at the mercy of the evil character. Sammy Jo was neutral evil. Krystal, Fallon, and Mark were neutral good. Blake was lawful evil.Dominque was chaotic good.

reply

I never thought they showed all rich people as good and poor people as bad. To me Alexis, Adam, Ben, and Dex were chaotic evil with no chance at any redemption. Joseph, Kirby Claudia, Stephen and Jeff were true good people at the mercy of the evil character. Sammy Jo was neutral evil. Krystal, Fallon, and Mark were neutral good. Blake was lawful evil.Dominque was chaotic good.

Not throughout the entire series, no. But (as stated in the first post) in Season 3 and Season 4 specifically, the show got into a very "Reagan era" pattern of portraying the rich as deserving of their wealth and the poor deserving of that.

One might expect the Carringtons to have that snobbery, but for a while, the show itself began seeming to condone that value system.

--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

Reagan era? Not really. What you are describing is not a capitalist society but socialism where the elites wine and dine sipping on champagne while 90 percent are starving. Just look at all the socialist and communist countries. You are poor and you stay poor unless you sell out and become a regime goon.

reply

True, but the mamby pamby tone of it was strictly '80s.

--

reply

I never thought of Dex as evil at all. Sammy Jo was alternately good and evil, but during the evil times, she was quite horrid. She tried to gaslight Claudia, sell Danny for money, and have Krystle kidnapped.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

reply

Sammy Jo was "evil" (or rather, greedy) when Heather Locklear was just a recurring part of the cast. When they finally realised that they had to write her in permanently into the series, they had to pretty much do a complete turn-around with her character, starting with Krystle forgiving her for the Rita plot, which was plainly awkward.

reply

Sammy Jo was "evil" (or rather, greedy) when Heather Locklear was just a recurring part of the cast. When they finally realised that they had to write her in permanently into the series, they had to pretty much do a complete turn-around with her character, starting with Krystle forgiving her for the Rita plot, which was plainly awkward.


Heather Locklear was a regular in season 2, a recurring guest star in seasons 3, 4 and 5 (when she alternately starred on T.J. Hooker) and was brought back as a regular in season 6, at which time the Krystle/Rita story took off. No, they didn't turn her around when they realized she would be a permanent character. They began season 6 at full throttle with Sammy Jo deeply entrenched in the Rita/Krystle story with Sammy Jo bringing in Joel. In fact, the original plan was to keep the story going all season long with the conclusion at season's end/cliffhanger. The original plan wasn't to turn around Sammy Jo. However, due to falling ratings and viewer complaints, Dynasty turned course midseason. They quickly halted production, scrapped two episodes that were filmed and hastily wrote a conclusion to the Rita/Joel storyline. Thus, as they were keeping Heather, they had to quickly write a 180 for Sammy Jo's character.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I have just binge-watched the the seasons 1 thru 3 and am halfway thru season 4. I will stop in the next few episodes. You are so right about how season 3 was the beginning of the end.

The charters become morons and the stories become stupid. Main example - Fallons search for the truth about Adam. She heard he had handled a case in Billings with mercuric oxide. What does she do? Hire a detective to find out the story? Hire an attorney look up the case in Lexus-Nexus?

No, she call 411 (telephone information) to ask for companies that manufacture mercuric oxide. She and Jeff fly to Billings and gumshoe it in the most inane way. The only pleasure of this story arc is seeing Royce Applegate play a rube.

And why did no one ever ask Adam to take a blood test?

reply

I hope that you don't give up on the show altogether. The Moldavian Massacre is cool, though the aftermath is disappointing. Alexis and Ben (Blake's brother) try to destroy Blake in the second half of Season 6. There's a trial, which is riveting. Season 8, while showing Dynasty's age, is quite cohesive in its storylines. So you can skip around to those parts.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

reply

I hope that you don't give up on the show altogether. The Moldavian Massacre is cool, though the aftermath is disappointing. Alexis and Ben (Blake's brother) try to destroy Blake in the second half of Season 6. There's a trial, which is riveting. Season 8, while showing Dynasty's age, is quite cohesive in its storylines. So you can skip around to those parts.

I can tell that you're not going to be able to fool RugGuy.

--


reply

I have just binge-watched the the seasons 1 thru 3 and am halfway thru season 4. I will stop in the next few episodes. You are so right about how season 3 was the beginning of the end.

Yes, and it just gets worse.

But do watch Season 9 -- it's a fabulous death rattle for the show.

--

reply

THE MOLDAVIAN MASSACRE WAS THE BEST CLIFHANGER EVER FOR A SOAP.

SEASON 5 ENTERING AMANDA = OXENBERG GAVE NEW BREATH FOR THE SHOW.

NADER AND OXENBERG HAD A GREAT CHEMISTRY TOGETHER.

THEIR LOVE SCENE IN EPISODE 18 IN S 6 WAS ONE OF THE BEST EVER IN SOAPS.


THE BEST EVER LOVE SCENE WAS BETWEEN SAMMY JOE AND STEVEN IN SEASON 7 EPISODE WHEN AN AMAZING HEATHER SEDUSES JACK AND THE WHOLE SCENE WITH BEAUTIFUL MUSIC AND A GREAT CHEMISTRY THOSE TWO ACTORS HAD WAS MY NO 1 LOVE SCENE IN THE HISTORY OF TELEVISION.

And mr,prometheus........DID ANYONE TOLD YOU.....YOU ARE NOT A REAL DYNASTY FAN WHEN U BASH ALMOST ALL DYNASTY SEASONS ?


OYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY



DYNASTY HATER...........OYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

reply

A milligram of Zoloft. It's just so simple.

--



reply

I'm sorry for my nerves but u are talking to one of the MOST FANATIC DYNASTY FANS EVER LIVED IN THIS PLANET AND I CAN'T STAND TROLLS BEEPING MY FAV SHOW....So u understand.

I am 47 years old.....I grew up with dynasty as a teen. I fell in love with this show. I never missed an episode and when I had to choose on a Friday night to watch EITHER DYNASTY ... OR BREAK UP WITH MY GIRLFRIEND.........OF COURSE I BROKE UP WITH MY GIRLFRIEND SO TO WATCH MY FAV SHOW.......LOL

Got it now ? when the show was cancelled I FREAKED OUT...I CRIED FOR HOURS IN 1989.

WHEN THE REUNION WAS CONFIRMED...............I WAS ALIVE AGAIN IN 1991.


If it was on my hands I would continue that show like bell continues the BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL soap all those years and I would never missed an episode.


I AM A REAL DYNASTY FAN........I LOVE THIS SERIES....THE PLOTS....THE ACTORS....EVERYTHING......

I EVEN LOVED THE COLBYS...I SEE THEM AS CONTINUATION OF DYNASTY STORIES....AS I EVEN LOVED SEASONS 1,9 although they are bad THEY ARE STILL...."DYNASTY"....SO THEY ARE GOOD FOR ME.

THE REUNION WOULD BE GREAT IF GORDON THOMSON, JACK COLEMAN AND MICHAEL NADER WERE BACK...ESPECIALLY DEX WHO COULD FIGHT AGAINST JEREMY VAN DORN SAVING ALEXIS ONCE AGAIN AT THE END.

I HAVE ALL DVD'S......T-SHIRTS.....POSTERS.....V.H.S........PICTURES.....EXPENSIVE SIGNATURES........I PAID 10,000 $ TO GET GENUINE DYNASTY OBJECTS (paintings, tables, clothes...etc) FROM AUCTIONS HELD IN THE PAST...I HAVE A WHOLE DYNASTY MADE ROOM IN MY HOUSE.



And u come here saying.......dynasty was for 2-3 seasons ?



AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH



I REST MY CASE.

reply

Wow!

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

reply

Yet we both loved Season 2, romanempire. Isn't it wonderful that we agree about some things??

--

reply

No we don't. u don't love dynasty. I DO. I LOVE ALL THAT HAS TO DO WITH DYNASTY. THE GOOD AND THE BAD. YOU ONLY PRAISE THOSE SEASONS WHICH GOT THE WORST RATINGS.
EVEN SEASON 2 DID NOT GOT MUCH HIGH RATINGS.

U TRY TO BURY THE SHOW............NOW U EXPOSED.

reply

Why do you post with all capital letters? Is it for effect?

--

reply

I post in caps when I want to EMPHASIZE a point and in that case the point is that u a troll as u admitted u don't like most of this show.....AND YET U ARE HERE BEEPING OUR BALLS LIKE THE TRUE DYNASTY FAN BENS SAID ALSO.

Now....i'm sure there are a few other soaps that u like more than dynasty.....why u don't go there so that peace can come in to this board ?

reply

What are you talking about?

--

reply

I'm talking about leaving this board. U made your point. YOU DON'T LIKE DYNASTY and u praise only dynasty's least successful seasons.......maybe it's time to quit now ?
Ok u made your point. dynasty is trash after season 2 in your opinion......but u still here.......WHAT ARE U DOING HERE ? HAVEN'T U BASHED THE SHOW ENOUGH ?

reply

Oh, please don't leave!

--

reply

of course not....I love dynasty....I will be here.....WHAT THE HELL ARE U DOING HERE ?

reply

"But do watch Season 9 -- it's a fabulous death rattle for the show."

Fucking hell, did Paulsen pay you to promote season 9? I've seen you trying to sell that crap as the best thing ever on the Dynasty discussion board over at tellytalk. Normal people despise it. And just stop it with the socks. I see you're still doing it on tellytalk.

reply