So, for the second time, [the Pharisees]
summoned the man who had been blind and said:
"Speak the truth before God.
We know this fellow is a sinner."
"Whether or not he is a sinner, I do not know,"
the man replied.
"All I know is this:
once I was blind and now I can see."
Nothing cryptic here. What the once blind man is telling the Pharisees (who accuse of false pride and blasphemy) is that he is not here to judge the man Jesus; all he do can is put forth what the man has done for all to see (he claims to have been healed by the man), which may stand or fall on its own rights.
This fits nicely with the theme of the film - that of a flawed human who simply does as he does. There is no tone of either judgment or idolization of LaMotta. What we get is a beautifully cinematic ride into the psyche of the protagonist. Everything else is up to the viewer.
It seems pretty obvious to me. I've just had a search for various other theories on the meaning but they all are needlessly complex and silly, imo.
reply
share