To the poster who wrote: "what rape?"
Watch the DVD set, my friend, or read any critique of the feminist aspects of ALIEN or ANY smart critique of the horror in the film. When the Alien kills Yaphet Kotto & Veronica Cartwright's characters, his tail sneaks up in between (Ms. Cartwright) Lambert's legs and she seems to be cowering in a way that suggests her death will be slower than Mr. Parker's. Then we cut back to Ripley as she's hearing them get slaughtered and we hear what sounds like a wicked, evil laugh.
The intention of Scott was to hint that the horrors that Cartwright experienced were indeed sadistic, perhaps also sexual . . . why would the "bug" need to caress the inside of her leg with his scorpion-like tail? Why would there be a cold, terror inducing cackle heard over the headset? It's just suggested of course -- but even as a 14 year old seeing the film for the first time ('79), I got it. It was SCARY as hell.
The later poster is also correct in suggesting the "egg laying probe" of the face-hugger inserted into John Hurt's character also suggested a violation -- the creature does after all, use its "invasive organ" to "impregnate" a host. The director and team were using layers of terror to induce horror on the audience in both overt and subtle ways -- if you got it, you got it. If not, it may have played on a subliminal layer. Sexual terror is profoundly disturbing -- because its so personal.
Of course, the Alien DID NOT rape Lambert like the fishmen of the Corman flick, but the suggestion of same is simply terrifying.
reply
share