MovieChat Forums > Heaven's Gate (1981) Discussion > Would a Barry Lyndon fan enjoy the 219 m...

Would a Barry Lyndon fan enjoy the 219 minute version?


I've been reading some posts on this board and I've seen Kubrick's Barry Lyndon mentioned more than three times, which, given it's poor recognition, is pretty astounding.

Well, as my love of Barry Lyndon should indicate, I'm someone who is enchanted by beautiful cinematography. What's more, I'm also a fan of films that happen to be 3 hours, having also seen, and enjoyed, Sergio Leone's "Once Upon a Time..." films. For anyone unfamiliar with the three aforementioned films, a great deal of people have described them as having sluggish pacing and even self-indulgent scenes, which are the same flaws attributed to Heaven's Gate and seen as one of the main contributers to it's mediocrity.

reply

I'd say watch it. It's definitely features some of the best cinematography of any film ever made (and as long as were going to bring up Morricone, David Mansfield's music is among the greatest scores ever made).... And it has many thematic similarities to Once Upon a Time in America (the building of countries, the bloody underbelly of capitalism, the examination of Myth and Genre, immigration and poverty, dreams and memories, the American Dream), not to mention, similarly troubled releases which often mirrored each other (although the Leone is the only film that has been completely reclaimed by critics).

Personally, I think it's a more coherent film than the Leone. And while Barry Lyndon is my favorite Kubrick, I certainly have a stronger personal attachment to the Cimino.

reply

If you are a big movie fan then you should watch it regardless. I am a huge fan of "Barry Lyndon" and I don't think the two compare. "Heaven's Gate" is achingly long. It takes too long for the main conflict to get started. I will agree with the above poster that the score is terrific and there are some individual shots that are breathtakingly beautiful. Some scenes are so poorly shot that you can't even tell what is going on. In the main battle scene in the last act the scenes were so filled with dust I twice mistook the death of a character who was still very much alive.

"Heaven's Gate" is not a total disaster but it's not a very good film either. Plenty of script issues that were never worked out. Frankly I found the opening sequence at the Harvard graduation to be the best scenes in the film.

reply

Yup, pretty much in the same league as Barry Lyndon. Even the stories resemble each other. It's a depressing movie about depressing times, and Cimino is as harsh with politics as Kubrick. As a piece of social critique both stand as prime examples of art with a big A that can be relevant through its form as much as its story.


www.eskalierende-traeume.de

reply

[deleted]

Michael Cimino is not stanley Kubrick. Nowhere close. But Kubrick didn't direct Heaven's Gate. Cimino did. So definitely see the 219 minute version of this astonishingly beautiful Cimino film!

reply

at least for the first half of the film then it devolves into a standard Land Baron vs settlers film.

I do enjoy Barry Lyndon but "all" of Kubricks films are on par with one another in their excellence and artistic vision and delivery.

I think Heavens Gate is an excellent film, interspersed with a mediocre film with the gaps apparent in the stitching. Too bad....coulda been a master piece.

Hmmm...I'm not a film student...did Kubrick take on the American West? Let me google that...............................No, he did not. Too bad. I'd like to see it. Ballad of Cable Hogue mixed with amped up Peckinpaw violence a la Clockwork Orange with some Eyes Wide Shut kink between horses and cattle?

IF---instead of a movie---one thinks of this as a two or three part MasterPiece Theater soap opera, the languid mixed up piece is easier to take. Enjoying what is good in it and gettng popcorn for the tweeners.

Its worth seeing, just to show the differenct between Excellent and Not Focused On.

reply

Yes, definitely if your a fan of "Barry Lyndon" and the visuals-over-all approach to filmic storytelling.

I'd also say that, like me, if you consider "Days of Heaven" and "McCabe & Mrs. Miller" to not only be two of the best films of the 70's, but also two of the best American films of all-time period, you need to see "Heaven's Gate" immediately.



















"Go balls deep, Dad!"
-Scotty Crane

reply

Hi Smiley--thanks for the review. You said:

Yes, definitely if your a fan of "Barry Lyndon" and the visuals-over-all approach to filmic storytelling. /// Ambiguous. Are you saying that Kubrick is weak in plot/character/theme development in general or only that he did "focus" on filmic atmospherics in Barry Lyndon? ... and even saying that... those non filmic elements are very well done as well. Special lens, candle lit only night scenes. Not a negative there, just a surfeit of positives???

I'd also say that, like me, if you consider "Days of Heaven" and "McCabe & Mrs. Miller" to not only be two of the best films of the 70's, but also two of the best American films of all-time period, you need to see "Heaven's Gate" immediately. /// Well, I have seen all three. Each has their faults and superlatives. They are all closely related in plot and theme. Depends on how close close is I suppose?

I would say all are worth seeing and better than most. Beyond that, I'd say "Unforgiven" bests those three? Its good we have enough to choose from to have our own favorites?

reply

I'd say overall "Days of Heaven", "McCabe" and "Barry Lydon" are three perfect films and I consider all three to be 3 of the greatest ever made and the three films that are the prospective best films of their creators (the best films of Malick, Altman and Kubrick, which is saying alot). But I also realize I love and have bias toward historical films usually that exude a visionary bent and are striving for authenticity photographically and in design (as you mentioned with the lenses created for "Barry Lyndon" to achieve that authentic look, or the high exposure to the negative done to get the look in "McCabe & Mrs. Miller" for instance)

"Heaven's Gate" is nowhere near that close. It has many flaws that those films don't have: its got pacing issues, scenes that do seem unnecessary, untrue and over the top (usually in scenes where intimate dialog/character development is taking place between actors in a room--Kris Kristopherson is also just a lame-duck actor in my opinion who can't sing or act and I would have never cast him in any role, especially the lead...hell, I'll even take Sam Eliott or Tommy L. Jones in terms of 'cowboy typecasts' over Kris Kristopherson..hell, I'll even take Ryan *beep* O'Neal as a cowboy over him, lol:)

It could be argued that it might not be even Michael Cinimo's best film: both "Thunderbolt and Lightfoot" and "Deer Hunter" have much stronger acting, characters that are better fleshed-out, and a narrative that's more coherent in my opinion.

Where "Heaven's Gate" is a wonder is in the visuals: the photography(which let's give as much credit to the director as we will Vilmos Zigmund, of "McCabe" fame and a photographer of many great works of the 1970's and beyond), the choreography and the sets (you can always see every cent of the $44,000,000 budget was used)--- In the scenes of crowds, and community and dance. Cinimo knows how to control a vast crowd and pack a frame with the rhythmic sprawl and motion that comes with human life better than almost anyone. The battle scenes are still widely criticized, but I'll say it is utterly authentic...a western frontier war in the Wyoming summer would look exactly that: a brutal dust of carnage and chaos.








"Go balls deep, Dad!"
-Scotty Crane

reply

I'll quibble and say you can't call the three films "perfect" and then go on to list their defects. Substantively, I'll give you Kristopherson but O'Neal? I have to draw the line with O'Neal. ..... Hmmmm!?! He was perfectly fine in Lyndon. And Kristopherson is great at playing wooden characters.

Maybe it all in the camera angles?

reply

Absolutely. Heaven's Gate can stand with Barry Lyndon, The Leopard, 1900, and Once Upon a Time in America. It's that good of a movie.

reply