Is the original, theatrical release that bad?
I've seen the restored version of Heaven's Gate and couldn't fathom why it had been critically panned. It seemed like an exquisitely filmed, elegiac and poetic Western. The pacing didn't bother me; I don't mind relaxing and watching a 'slow' film unfold and I thought the performances were pretty much good across the board. I haven't seen the original cut, however.
I'm glad that with DVD we've had the chance to see it as intended and it does seem as if contemporary critical opinion has changed based on the new cuts. While they're not hailing it as a masterpiece, a lot of people do seem to be coming around to accepting that the film isn't as bad as it's made out to be.
It seems similar to Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid which also suffered from a bastardized theatrical cut. That wasn't as universally panned as Heaven's Gate but it's still a film that has benefited from a restored version, and that restored version is one of my favourite films.
Was the theatrical cut of Heaven's Gate really that bad and what is it about it which differs to the, in my opinion, quality cut of the film that's available to us now.