MovieChat Forums > The Martian Chronicles (1980) Discussion > Spender should have killed Wilder, not B...

Spender should have killed Wilder, not Briggs


Briggs wasnt that sensitive, and was a jerk, so what?

he was just a working man doing his job, and he's killed along with two other working class astronauts.

meanwhile, Wilder, who was the head of getting Americans up onto Mars, and who is the primary reason that Briggs was even up there in the first place, and whose entire life depended on going to Mars and who even kept talking the "evil" government into it, doesn't die, simply because he "feels" for what's happened on Mars.

IN OTHER WORDS, Wilder feels "bad" for what HE HAS CAUSED (HE, WILDER, sent those ships to Mars who had chicken pox), so he's a good guy just for feeling a little guilty, while Briggs, just a guy working for a living, is killed for being rude and obnoxious, ie, insensitive, ignorant.

lame!!

if Spender was really that angry, he should have killed ONLY Wilder, and realized that the others were just ignorant puppets all following his, Wilder's, orders to go to Mars.

Briggs Canal was named in Brigg's honor.

long live the memory of Briggs.

the poor guy was just relaxing, splashing his feet around.

oh Briggs, God bless you.

reply

More like Briggs God damn you. Briggs got what he deserved. Simple as that.

Wilder did not deserve to die. After what happened to Spender, he immediately understood what Spender was driving at, and knew what had to be done.

Nuff said.

reply

I agree with you bludthunder! Briggs was against everything the Martians civilization stood for and Wilder hated that some of the mean men from Earth were making it to Mars. We can see this about Wilder in two places. One where he, Father Peregreine, and Father Stone are in the ruined Martian city that is being dismatled and Two in a talk he had with General Halstead.

reply