Futuristic?


Netflix has had some off description before, but when you highlight The Warriors it says something to the tune of "This futurist movie was ranked x out of a list of top cult classics."

I never saw The Warriors as futuristic in setting, though Streets of Fire does have an ambiguity to it and if you wanted to say these films are related then I can almost see the argument. However, to me The Warriors is just set in a late '70s NYC that has some stylized gangs.

THE ONLY CRITIC WHO CAN REVIEW WHILE JOGGING:
http://bit.ly/1pPzoBc

reply

I could sort of see how they're saying that...

but for it's time...it was ahead of it's time...what, 1979? Was def fresh in the day...



"Hey...I like that...I like that!!" Terry Silver Karate Kid III

reply

The Warriors seems surrealistic, not futuristic.

reply

I agree, I do not see it as a futuristic film. The movie was filmed in 1979 when NYC was a dangerous place. There were numerous gangs in NYC in the mid/late 70s and there were certain neighborhoods you simply did not go to, especially after dark. The Warriors uses real street names and neighborhoods.

I know in the directors cut it takes more of comic book feel. However, if anything I view the film as more dystopian than futuristic. There is a bit of "A Clockwork Orange" element.

Streets of Fire simply say "another place, another time" which leads to lots of interpretations.

reply

It always seemed a little futuristic to me but that's because the style of it reminds me of Escape From New York/L.A.

reply