Argento didn't understand the social commentary and message that Romero was trying to make with Dawn. In his cut, he edited out all the humor, and all the digs at consumerism Romero was crafty at conveying. Argento's version is basically one of a European not understanding American culture at that time in the 1970s, so his cut of Dawn plays like a standard horror/action flick with no depth to it.
With that, I'd go with the Extended Cut. I like the segments later in the movie when Peter, Stephen and Fran are getting sick of each other in the mall. It shows just ho much the appeal of having the mall all to themselves started to wear off after a while, especially after Roger dying. Romero's theatrical cut glossed over a lot of that characterization.
reply
share