underated pacino film.


I have this on video at the moment I had to buy it from the U.S. I think it is a graet film one I would call a tragic love story. Pacino is Great as ever playing the character very sutely. Deerfield is a man very withdrawn and only lives for the buzz of race driving until he meets Lilian the opposite of himself in the way she lives her life. I think she would of brought Deerfield completely out of his shell if she had, had more time with him. It was a sad depressing end to the film but totally nessecary showing Deerfield ride away back to his way of life alone. It showed really how meeting someone could totally change your view and attitude towards life but also how fate can lead to you not escaping your old one. A Great film with a good message in there aswell. Great acting from all.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Beautiful and sad.

reply

Fantastic movie, with beautiful shots, be it from the Alps or the racetrack. Wonderful scenes from 70s Florence and other parts of Tuscany too. And even more importantly, a good story and stellar performances from Hoffman and Keller. Why, oh why, are gems like these so forgotten and underrated?



reply

I'm not at all an Al Pacino fan but I found him excellent in this movie!


/ana:l nathrakh, u:rth va:s bethud, dokhje:l djenve:/.

reply

Of course I wouldn't ever dare call this film a masterpiece, and of course Al Pacino has been seen in better performances, and of course Marthe Keller had a beautiful face but couldn't really act at all. And, most of all perhaps: of course it's overly schmaltzy...

But then - operas are often schmaltzy, too. And many people love operas. "Bobby Deerfield" IMHO sometimes comes across like an operetta, and I feel it's this way you can enjoy it most. Cinematography is excellent, and on top of all I absolutely ADORE Dave Grusin's beautiful and sentimental score.

reply

[deleted]

He is so gorgeous in this movie!

reply

You mean Pacino and Keller right?


Whenever I get the urge to exercise, I lie down until it passes.

reply

I agree, I love this film! Very underrated, I really don't understand why people hate both this and Author Author so much! I just re-watched this with my mom, & we both loved this and Author Author, I gave both films a 10/10 rating. However, I have to disagree with your assessment that Pacino was living through his racing. I believe that he may have had a fuller life or at least, had a life when he was younger. He would do impressions of Mae West as a kid, w/c is a clue to how this lifeless man became a race-car driver & how he had lost himself in the process. But I believe racing was what eventually sucked him dry or his approach to racing. It was mentioned that he had many friends who died in their profession, & Lillian commented that he lived his life, trying to 'not die'. I believe there is no truer statement said about Bobby, I never really considered it, even when we were shown him lamenting (well, not really lamenting but you know what I mean) & fussing over how his peer-racer died. It made sense that he was concerned, for all I know, he did this occasionally but the moment she said those words, it became a revelation to Bobby and his life. It was true, he may have had more substance before but as soon as he became more meticulous with death & its prevention, he at the same time, learned to numb himself around that concept & to everything around him. Numbing himself or this self-detachment was the only way he knew how to cope with the high risk job he had undertaken (he couldn't even muster any facade of feeling for his ailing mother, his brother went to France, all the way from Nework[sp?] just to plead for him to visit their mother, how sad is that?). He couldn't really think about death & racing 24/7 w/o a coping mechanism of sorts, numbing himself was his defense, defense from fears involved with the job. To be able to live through it, & at the same time, go over its possibilities/prevention schemes, to be able to function, to self-preserve amidst the fear. We see him & his life w/ his devoted girlfriend, a lifeless & empty existence, & we contrast this to Morrelli & hers. Bobby has lived with death for so long, he became accustomed to it & it became a shadow he had to live with in his life, Lillian was newer to the experience & handled it differently. Lilian & 'her manly hands', her strong masculine features were the embodiment of life or the 'opposite' Bobby needed, as Lillian commented, Bobby was more delicate, effeminate even, and I just loved that not only were their characters different, their physicality attested to that fact, it was the embodiment of these 2 opposing forces drawn together. Towards the end, at the tunnel, I expected or was waiting for Bobby to scream, but he never did, that to me spoke more than anything, Bobby had reverted to his old life, or to his lack of life, & yes, this was not only a tragic love story, it was tragic for Bobby. To have experienced vibrancy (Lillian), to have learned & changed, only to revert back to before there was a Lillian. I imagined he went back to his girlfriend & they could've married, had children even. He was as hollow and as empty as he ever was, a lifeless corpse w/o a Lillian to give him life! So in the end, Lillian didn't only die, the Bobby that developed/was born through her, died with her as well.:(


Whenever I get the urge to exercise, I lie down until it passes.

reply

Yeah it's a pretty damn good film with great acting by all Pacino once again is great. Well worth a look if you can find it.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Just watched the (French) DVD I think the current 5.7 score is a bit low as it's certainly worth watching and gets a 7 from me. Weirdly, I've never seen it shown on British TV - is there some rights/distribution issue?

reply

great movie and keller was great too and i don't think that he'll be alone after she dies i always thought he'll find someone else or go back to the u.s to his family

reply

[deleted]