MovieChat Forums > Al-risâlah Discussion > Mohammad movie with No Mohammed?

Mohammad movie with No Mohammed?

posted 11 years ago by tymes
2 replies | jump to latest

So this movie about Muhammed doesn't actually have Muhammad in it?

I'll actually have to watch this but devout filmmakers should try to do lots of things to make a new bio-pic without the main character --- ?!?

We need a POV, Mohammed movie so we get the story but don't have to see him (with no mirrors or other reflections).

Sad.

Seriously, there is nothing specific against images of M. but a general disapproval of any image of _all_ prophets and all only to prevent idolatry... consequently, non-flattering imagery is probably entirely ok since it wouldn't contribute to idolatry.
To rail against the idolatry of anyone other than God is _too_ much about whomever... so if thou doest protest too much then that is probably worst that the "provocative" depiction.

peace be upon everyone.

[–] tymes 10 years ago

this is where the habib came from. The first wife was ok, and the truth was she was the boss the boss and the source of all of M's wealth and power. She died and M used her assets and developed his own might.

It was later that to protect themselves that his wives started hiding and donned the habib. It wasn't about modesty but most blessed had many wives and they needed to be protected and hidden and shrouded.

Any other wife didn't need to hide and protect themselves but that is what eventually happened. And every wife is suffering his later wives injustices.

m had wifes that needed protection and the habib afforded them some modest protection. Meanwhile his first wife wore nothing nor did any other wife anywrere. Now the habib is a symbol of modesty but back then it was a symbol of don't hurt me you don't know who I am.

[–] Troll (507) 8 years ago

I love Muhammad !