MovieChat Forums > The Missouri Breaks (1976) Discussion > Was Frederick Forrest's character a pedo...

Was Frederick Forrest's character a pedofile?


As you recall, the rustler played by Frederick Forrest arrives in this mining town to sell the stolen horses. The FIRST thing he does is accost a young boy mine worker and orders him to go into the saloon and bring him out a glass of whisky. After that he says to the boy, "Let's go get cleaned up and get us some dinner." Immeadiately after, he goes to the outhouse and is killed by Brando. Although, there is never any consummation of this new relationship, what is one to assume would have happened between him and the boy?

reply

ur kidding...right?

reply

This is a ridiculous assertion.

reply

A pedofile might think so...but perhaps you were just attracted to Frederick Forrest and pictured yourself as the boy. Anyway, I wondered for a sec about the relationship at the time and thought the kid might be his son, as Frederick calls him so, although that doesn't mean anything too.


reply

He actually says "I won't be but a minute, then I'm gonna get something to eat" before he goes in the outhouse. Where on earth did you get the idea he had designs on that boy? That's absurd.

reply

[deleted]

"I won't be but a minute, then I'm gonna get something to eat"

That's what I heard too.

Nothing of the sort about meeting up with the kid later.




http://tinyurl.com/9-simple-easy-guacamole-recip

reply

NO he dosen't offer to buy the boy a drink. He gives him a silver dollar to buy him a glass of whiskey, then after he drinks it he gives the kid the empty glass and puts the change in it for a tip. That's all.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Young boys in those days were put to work very young. This kid is a miner of some kind, maybe Silver.

You notice everyone in that town has a hustle. Remember the tailor ("Ja... it fits!")?

The kid is anxious to make a few bucks from this newly rich horse rustler, so he waited outside the outhouse, expecting more tips and a good meal.

I think it's more a sign of the times that someone might read "pedophilia" into this scene... OUR times, not that of the film.

reply