Why is castration acceptable?
Hi, sorry for the provocative question partially based off on this movie.
Even on such men who did not do any kind of violent and damaging acts with their penises, why is castration of men in general by otherwise normal and civilized people seem acceptable?
Even if men in general ARE indeed more violent, sexually depraved and have committed far more as such offenses to be perceived as a general threat (against women AND men and others too), why is it seem as OK to perform damaging operations on their penises?
And if men in general were NOT as violent and torturous like that for thousands of years of human history, differences aside and/or together, would castration of men then be seen just as wrong, horrible and nasty [insert all other adjectives here] as any kind of mutilation against female sexual organs, regardless of whether or not it is justified or done for one's own sadistic sakes?
And when you reply, please don't JUST say that "oh, this is because feminists, this, that blah blah blah etc" seem acceptable, just state that "oh how wrong and hypocritical people are" etc, try to state FACTS and give a little maybe historical, scientific and biological approach ("Ah, you see, its also because men and women differ biologically like THIS" etc.)
P.S. I kinda wanted to ask ANOTHER related question, but I would spare you all the emotional social agony of addressing it here as either together WITH the matter OR in keeping it as a separate issue, but I bet some of you ALREADY have an idea of what I wanted to ask. (Oh, but castration as such causes tremenous physical agony as well regardless of the gender or the LOOKS of the perpetrator is ONE clue.)