I just went to the official Trevanian website, and noticed that (probably due to Whitaker's death) the film rights for his novels are "flying off the shelves" in a sense, including The Loo Sanction and Trevanian's other spy/assassin novel, Shimubi.
I'm curious to see if they'll somehow try to make it a direct sequel to Eastwood's movie. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to remake Eiger just for the sake of doing Loo.
I'm guessing that Trevanian fans are going to be disappointed - I've noticed that those of you who prefer the novel aren't too keen on the movie. I personally did enjoy the movie myself, but for what it was (that, and I love the John Williams score). I thought that the novel was entertaining, but really nothing more than that. It did have some really clever ideas (the fact that Hemlock is loyal to the wrong people, etc), but I don't see what Trevanian was so stuck-up about.
I have yet to read The Loo Sanction, but I just picked it up yesterday, and I'll be getting to it soon.
--------------------------------- Jerry Goldsmith 1929-2004
I'm curious to see if they'll somehow try to make it a direct sequel to Eastwood's movie. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to remake Eiger just for the sake of doing Loo.
If they re-make The Eiger Sanction, they'll probably resort to CGI rather than the authentic climbing footage that renders Eastwood's film so distinctive. reply share
The same thought crossed my mind, and I immediately shivered violently. I don't think that The Eiger Sanction is an amazing movie, but there are a lot of small elements that, combined, make it enjoyable for me. And one of the things that I admire about Eastwood and the movie is that, despite the fact that Eastwood was not too keen on making the movie (he thought the script/book was ridiculous, to my understanding), he put that much dedication and effort into it, getting the authentic climbing footage, and even doing the majority of his own stunts. The fact that he devoted himself to climbing so much for this one movie that he had no real desire to do is impressive - you don't see that in many actors.
So, since it's inevitable, who could possibly play Hemlock in The Loo Sanction? I didn't think he was amazing, but I thought Eastwood did a pretty decent job in the role, and it's hard to imagine what actors these days could pull it off.
--------------------------------- Jerry Goldsmith 1929-2004
Yeah, it would be hard to imagine anyone today with the same combination of toughness and intelligence.
Paul Newman originally rejected the script for The Eiger Sanction, and then Eastwood picked it up. I don't think that Eastwood thought much of the script (which is shallow and disjointed in places), but he loved the idea of realizing it visually, with everything authentic and nothing faked. I also suspect that he was attracted to some of the cynical, subversive geopolitical commentary that actually pushes The Eiger Sanction closer to The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (Martin Ritt, 1965) than to James Bond. And, yes, it was impressive for Eastwood, who at that time was the world's leading movie star, to be willing to commit himself to climbing like that when he had no real experience. Dougal Haston, a veteran climber who worked on the film, reportedly told Eastwood and his associates, "You're out of your f*c&8ng minds," when informed of their plans. Eastwood risked his life on one of the world's most dangerous mountains, and a crew member named David Knowles died during the production thanks to a sudden rock slide. Knowles was a 26-year old veteran climber who had scaled the Eiger twice, so he wasn't taking any unusual risks. Unfortunately, he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, a place where Eastwood had been a few minutes before. Eastwood (who also directed) considered canceling the production in the wake of Knowles' death (he reportedly started to cry), but the other climbers urged him to continue because the risks epitomized their way of life.
And I agree, The Eiger Sanction, is not a great film that comes together perfectly, but it has enough going for it to make it appreciable. I write about it some here:
Yes, I read about Knowles and how Eastwood was ready to halt production out of respect for Knowles and out of fear for everyone else, which is a very admirable trait.
And actually, I find it amusing how he really didn't think too much of it since Trevanian thought so much of his novel. Frankly, I thought it was entertaining, but it just seems to me that Trevanian thought more of himself and his abilities as a writer. Although, I was disappointed that the film version of Eiger didn't really display the total irony of Hemlock's devotion, how he is very devoted and loyal to the people who betray him the most.
So who knows how The Loo Sanction will work out. I wonder if whomever holds the rights would attempt to pursue Eastwood to direct it at least, or if they just want to distance themselves from Eiger.
--------------------------------- Jerry Goldsmith 1929-2004
Does anyone else think the story of the "Loo Sanction" would be virtually impossible to catch in a movie?
"The Eiger Sanction" was hard enough to get all the sarcasm, double meaning, and irony into, the Loo Sanction doesn't even have the climbing to hang things around.
It's a parody of the "All American Superspy", and parody on film normally has to be over stated to work, which would kill the flow of Loo.
The Eiger Sanction was almost impossible to film, stroppy. But I agree that Loo would be harder. It was very much of its time (70s) and for so many reasons would not translate well. The character Amazing Grace, for example, never wears clothes. Can't see that happening, and that's one of the easier things...no. And I don't think I could watch it because it would be a mess.
I would love to know how the scene with Eastwood and Kennedy was done when they scaled that one peak in the earlier part of the film before going to Europe. The one where they sit up there and have a warm beer. Was it with a helicopter? Couldn't be, because they are close-up, then they pan out.....and out.....and out.....! How in the world did they do that? Kennedy was speaking, so the helicopter's noise, and prop wash would have been readily apparent. The scenes on the Eiger were equally impressive, but explainable....anyone in the know?
OK...The scene on top of the pillar in Monument Valley was done by lowering the actors from helicopter by winch, with the pullaway shot done from a helicopter, the noise of which would have been dubbed over by the actors relooping their lines at a later time. As to the scenes on the Eiger, they filmed on the lower levels of the North Face, actors and stuntmen both pulling double duty handling equipment and such...