I'm watching The Comic Book Crusader right now. I like this episode, but I have always thought that they were inconsistent with checking on people's alibis. Ellery was walking and no one saw him, and suddenly there's an article about him in the paper (pointing fingers at him). Meanwhile, that one other character was on the subway and the cops didn't bother to check his story (to see if anyone remembered seeing him there). Then Alma gets arrested because she lied about her story, even though they could have checked to see if she really was shopping that evening.
Also, why did Ellery think that the victim was pointing to him initially? The victim crossed out Ellery's name. He didn't circle it. Obviously he meant that Ellery didn't commit the crime.
Currently watching Veronica's Veils. Why was it so tough for them to figure out that the murder victim turned the film projector on and off on his own? I should have thought that this would have been obvious to the cops and to Ellery.
I've been trying for years to remember the name of the character actress who played the cleaning lady who hears the murder. She's done a gazillion things, but I can't remember any of them!
I guess the only thing you can do is to see her in some other TV show/film, and then look up the credits of that program/movie. Or maybe start a thread about it. Someone might be able to help you out. Good luck!
Also, why did Ellery think that the victim was pointing to him initially? The victim crossed out Ellery's name. He didn't circle it. Obviously he meant that Ellery didn't commit the crime.
I think they were just treating the blue X literally -- that since he marked the name, they suspected Ellery --
Actually, I thought it was stretching the idea just a little that the victim had enough wits still about him as he was dying to think, "If I blue pencil OUT Ellery's name, it will automatically remove both Ellery and the letterer as suspects, and leave the other elements/artists as the killers.
Ellery was darn lucky that Flannigan said something about blue penciling.
Honestly, Ellery should have figured the blue pencil gag out immediately... he's a writer, and we KNOW he gives his finished pages/chapters/book to an editor. we learned that in Pharaoh's Curse.
My mom was a writer -- I know this for sure. The editor, especially for a book, would make HIS corrections with a blue pencil -- additions/ deletions, etc. and give the pages back to Ellery for debate, clarification, and all that. Ellery should have caught on to the whole blue pencil long before he did, but if he had, the show would have been about 20 minutes long!
I think we have to remember that basically Ellery, Agatha Christie, Murder She Wrote, were all in the armchair detective kind of vein... not the more realistic, but still not totally accurate world of the CSI franchise.
Just my thoughts!
How sad, that you were not born in my time, nor I, in yours.
Oh, the stories are far-fetched, for sure. Dying clue...not sure if it would really be possible for anyone who has just been shot/stabbed, etc. to come up with something like that. I just kick back and enjoy these far-fetched mysteries. If you think that this ending is far-fetched, you ought to read some literature by John Dickson Carr. Now there's an author who knew how to come up with extremely unbelievable endings. ξΉ
I was also thinking that they had to find a way of setting it up so that Ellery would wind up in jail. But now I think that he should have been the suspect in the episode where that author gets killed. Ellery could have been at that awards party (instead of home with a cold) and then he could have been an obvious suspect.
Of course, if they had done it that way, then Jim wouldn't have had the chance to show off that adorable way of sneezing (covering his mouth with one hand and holding up his other hand). ξΉ