Underrated?


I've looked at a lot of rankings of the Bond films. This movie seems to consistently go on the bottom of all the lists. Sometimes it's on the very bottom, sometimes it makes it within the bottom five, but whether on a website's rankings, or in IMDB forums, this one just seems ALWAYS to be on the lower end.

But I really like TMWTGG. I actually think it's one of the better ones. Not THE best one - Sean Connery is too classic to allow that - but by my book, certainly in the top five, and maybe even in the top three. I think Maud Adams and Britt Ekland were both great Bond girls. I think the action succeeds in always keeping your attention. I think this movie is seriously underrated.

Does anyone else think so as well? Or am I the only one here who sees it as a good part of the Bond canon?

reply

I've always loved it. Did when I was young and still do now at 35. It has a interesting premise, good sets (the Queen Elizabeth is actually a great set), a great car chase, some lovely fillies, Christopher Lee at his sinister yet charming best and, what doesn't often get commented on, a surprisingly hard-edged Roger Moore.

reply

I think if anything, it's overrated.

reply

'The Man with the Golden Gun' has always been one of my favourite Bonds. I recently bought it on DVD and, despite having seen it godknows how many times since my mother took my brother and me to the cinema to see it when we were kids, I really enjoyed watching it again recently and will probably enjoy watching it again in the not too distant future.

reply

Nicely exotic, leisurely paced, has good oriental-tinged soundtrack and it´s never dull - far from bad. The Nick Nack element & silly karate scene diminish impression somewhat, but by no means crucially. The DAF-LALD-MWTGG stretch in the early 70s is my favourite also.


"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

Yes, I love that 3-film Guy Hamilton stretch of the early 70s! Great films!!

Never understood the hate.

Connery, Moore, and Brosnan! Accept NO substitutes!

reply

No, this is one of the worst Bond movies, period. I don't understand why people consider Moonraker and especially A View To A Kill among the worst. I've been a Bond fan long enough to hear all the insults against the same Bond films. I happen to love Moonraker and A View To A Kill.

Don't get me wrong, I don't hate The Man With The Golden Gun, but I do think it is the worst of the Roger Moore era due to the lack of a serious and engaging plot, ridiculous over the top camp, Moore seeming bored with the movie, the awful Mary Goodnight and at little point is the plot interesting.

How I would rank the Moore films personally:

1. For Your Eyes Only
2. The Spy Who Loved Me
3. Moonraker
4. A View To A Kill
5. Octopussy
6. Live And Let Die
7. The Man With The Golden Gun

reply

I always enjoy TMWTGG. Christopher Lee is great as the villain, Moore is Moore,the girls are beautiful.music's fine and it has a certain weirdness to it. It's very entertaining. I'd much rather watch it than any of the Brosnan films


watch my video-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTpYKfppC3g

reply

I think i'd call it fun nonsense, nothing great, but certainly not the worst. Scaramanga is my personal favourite bond villain, certainly elevated by Christopher Lee's epic performance.

there's no point in being grownup if you cant be childish sometimes!!!

reply

One of my least favorites but I still really like it. 7/10

reply

It's Bond, so it gets more than its share of viewing from me, but it's definitely among the bottom four or five.

Take Christopher Lee and John Barry's score out of this movie and what have you got? Roger Moore slapping around Maud Adams and Nick Nack eating peanuts.

reply

TMWTG is definetely underrated. It's much more entertaining than Octopussy or LTK.

In Finland we have this thing called "reilu meininki"

reply

I just watched it right now, and for the maybe 20th time. I have a scheme! To blank out my mind of preconcieved ideas and thoughts of negativity from scratch before I start the start button, now when I watch the underdog Bond movies. Two days ago it was A VIEW TO A KILL.

THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN is unique to me. I would call it The Ultimate Psychedelic Comic Book Bond. The Imagery resembles the comics of the early 70´s, with swirls, free form images, twisted angles and lines, exotic looking surroundings, broken rules of conventional ways to portrait everything "realistic". I am somewhat a comic book collector and artist myself, so I have the love of comics and its history. The style came from that the comic artists from USA, England, Spain etc was beginning to smoke grass as they drew. It was very common during this period for those who worked with music, art design, comics did it. It may repell some people here, but I tell you thats how it started to change.

So, I find Man With THe Golden Gun very fascinating. At least the first 2 thirds of the movie is impressing, fast paced, without giving you a chance to think about the film - you are taken from one scene to another. The locations are slightly surreal, like the mushroom like cliffs at Phuket, the multi sign landscape of the Hong Kong Night City, yeah, even the HQ inside the twisted Wreck where everybody walks around in the most awkward angles till you get dizzy. Scaramangas funhouse w mirrors and weird things are truly a "wonderful lowbudget" comic into film piece.

It belongs to the group of Fantasy Bonds which in a way began with Dr No, but got its outstanding style in Goldfinger, followed by YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE and DIAMONDS ARE FOR EVER. They all are different from eachother too, of course, as the comedy barometer peaks or goes down occasionally from film to film. For all of those who see these fantasyfilms as worse or lower than the realistic Bonds are not being truly honest if they claim to be right in sort of way. Because the combination of secret agents, sex and that pinch of sci fi was Flemings, and maybe other similar authors special thing in the 50´s. And the Fantasy Bond started already, as I see it , in Dr NO!

According to the "Behind the Scenes of THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN" documentary, the whole filmteam with actors were stuck on that island with no chance to phone in and call for new material, or whatever. They really were stuck there without a phone for a long time, and had a certain time to shoot the grand finale, with 5 actors and some explosives! What can they do? When you know all this, it becomes easier to understand the film.

But if you dont have that humour and imagination that came out of the 60s and 70´s, then you probably never will experience the uniqueness in these Fantasy films. incl GOLDEN GUN. I too wished, that the final duel was more an ordeal of a fight to the death, with sweat, near death situations, and rock climbing and all, AND something else than a deserted laboratory blowing up. But as the first 80 min are brilliant and full of atmosphere and imagination, they are utterly great to us who think that that is important in any piece of art!
Thanks!

reply

Everything before Bond goes to the island is great, based on that alone I'd call it underrated. But when they get to the island that's where it falls apart. I just found the conclusion of the solex subplot to be unnecessary and complex for complexity's sake. The solex should have been in the background to get 007 and Scaramanga together, it doesn't really make much sense for Scaramanga to be using and selling it. He's already wealthy and lives on a huge island rent-free.

--------------------
"Ram this in your clambake, bitchcakes!"

reply