Anyone else think Lee would have been more fitting with Sean Connnery?

Don't get me wrong, I do like Roger Moore. However, given how the dynamic is set up between Bond and Scaramanga in this film with a "dark mirror" angle and that's cool. And I do think playing up a darker and more edgy Bond makes sense for this kind of story because Scaramanga does play up the two sides of the same coin card when they meet, talking about how alike they were and trying to get Bond to admit it. And having that edgier Bond helps get this across more, because it adds the greater possibility of Bond being more like or having the potential to become more like Scaramanga. However, Moore's greatest strengths were in his charm and humor. And he just cannot pull off the darker things in my opinion like hurting Andrea for information or threatening the bullet manufacturer the way he does like Sean Connery could. Probably given that he (at least early on) played it with a great deal more intensity than Moore and it just came more naturally to him. With that, and how they (Sean Connery and Christopher Lee) look and act seem like a better fit for the two sides of the same coin angle. And I do think that type of story and some of the darker material that made it into this film would have felt more natural and worked better in a more serious piece. Like say if it had a tone more along the lines of "Dr. No", "From Russia With Love", or perhaps "Goldfinger". Some parts just felt a bit too silly and don't completely gel with the darker/edgier material IMO. That's not to say this film isn't entertaining at all, it's just I feel like there's a much better film buried in here somewhere.