Republican?

The novel or the movie? I didn't see many specifically Republican connotations of either, but the character Paul Kersey wasn't. His work colleague obviously was: "put them in concentration camps, Paul you're such a bleeding heart", "we need more cops than people". The character Paul we know was a conscientious objector. Now obviously he changed after the attack and went crazy and became a vigilante. However he doesn't change into a Republican.
The director Michael Winner was British and a Tory originally, however to switched to Labor to support Blair.
Charles Bronson himself never mentioned politics, however we do know that he changed his name from Buchowsky because he was scared under McCarthy to be thought a Communist. And this film was done during Watergate, so they wanted distance from that evil party. In any case if they knew what the Republican party had become they'd have distanced themselves even further from it.

A stronger case can be made that Clint Eastwood is, however he didn't like blank and said he wanted Bloomberg.

Yeah, it must be republican to get upset at people assaulting your family and the law doing nothing about it. The left/democrats , of course, would give the rapists a medal of honor and a statue and demand they have a national holiday on their behalf.

No, not necessarily. Back in the 70s, Democrats were actually *strongly for* law and order and maybe a bit of street justice when the legal system failed to protect innocent people. It's only really been in the last decade that Dems have moved so far left as to actually call for the defunding of police. If you told a Democrat back then (I used to be one in the 70s and was always strongly for law and order) that any elected official would call for defunding police today, they'd be incredulous.

this is not right wings movie. it common sense movie.

you have liberal in america who worship criminal. they call violent criminal 'victim too' hahahaha. you say "defund the polise" while people die at hands of criminal everyday hahahah.

this movie is antidote to those woketard sjw retarts cos they think "oh no someone killing criminals!! they criminal had rough childhood! they grow up in povertys! they victim too!!" and death wish like "nahh violent criminals get magnum 44 to heads" hahahahahaha. this film is antidote to gender pronown woketards.

?

It's a movie about a man who loses his family due to a brutal crime and he uses vigilante tactics on criminals.

It's a Batman story with guns.

You're a joke and not a good one

No. In the novel, Paul Benjamin (they changed the name for the movie), is a secular Jew who believes in all the liberal causes: socialized medicine, welfare, regulation of business, etc. etc. and he continues to believe in these things, he just had a road-to-Damascus conversion on the issue of crime. In the novel, when he goes out to Arizona, he notes that the area is heavily conservative, and he still feels contempt for their views on most social issues -- contempt is the exact word -- but he just finds himself now in agreement with conservatives on the issue of crime and criminals.