MovieChat Forums > Don't Look Now Discussion > Significance of the Laura photograph?

Significance of the Laura photograph?


First of all, I can not exalt and recommend this stunning film enough. I just viewed it for the second time over the weekend and I'm still mulling over it. Anyway, enough rhapsodizing about this film's greatness-- can anyone please explain the significance of the photograph of Laura John fished out of the trash when he returned to the hotel? Laura herself looked obviously surprised when the inspector handed it to her at the police station, as if she hadn't seen it in a long time or thought she'd lost it or something...Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

reply

Laura is understandably surprised to see the photo because she presumably recalls throwing it away. The main reason people throw photos away (apart from technical flaws) is that they haven't taken a good photo, which is backed up by the inspector's comment that she doesn't look much like her photo. You hear it all the time, people don't think they look like their photos because they are used to seeing themselves in mirrors which inverts the symmetry of the face. You have to take the scene in context with the other scene where the inspector views the sketches of the sisters, looks out of his window and sees them but fails to make them. This is really the whole conceit of the film: people see things that are not there, and people don't see things that are. That's my interpretation anyway.

reply

L0GAN5, thanks for your insightful thoughts on this film, especially "people see things that are not there, and people don't see things that are." Wonderful observation of the type that should be the norm in these forums. I have no patience for nitwits posting "I hated this film" types of comments. What's the point?

reply

Also, when and where was this photo taken place? That could help solve some of the questions as well. I thought perhaps it was somehow taken in the house with the sisters...she seemed to be wearing the same clothes...I will have to go back and look more closely.

reply