MovieChat Forums > Solyaris (1972) Discussion > Tarkovsky's worst movie

Tarkovsky's worst movie


I liked 'Andrei Rublev,' 'Nostalgia,' and 'Mirror.' Those films were like visual paintings, and even though they lacked traditional storytelling and plot, Tarkovsky's style and artistry is evident in all three. Here are my main issues with Solaris.

1) Why did Tarkovsky choose to make a film based on some hackneyed science fiction crap? His other films I saw were surreal explorations of human spirituality. Here I feel like I'm watching some terrible soap opera based in space.

2) The acting was AWFUL! Russian is my first language, I was born in the Soviet Union, and I remember watching movies around the same time period which had actors that were almost aware that they were acting while the camera was rolling. How did Tarkovsky get such incredible performances from his actresses in films like 'Nostalgia' and 'Mirror,' but here everyone sounds so forced and self-aware?

3) The visuals were hindered by the effects, which look terrible today. 'Andrei Rublev' is like a moving painting. The scenes in 'Mirror' are delicately crafted like a naturalistic painting. Here, I thought there were some beautiful shots in the first ten minutes, but everything onboard the spaceship looked like an unaired episode of 'Star Trek.'

Feel free to disagree with me and talk about the movie's amazing philosophy, which I probably didn't care to understand because I couldn't take any facet of the story seriously in the first place.

reply

[deleted]

"Why did Tarkovsky choose to make a film based on some hackneyed science fiction crap? Here I feel like I'm watching some terrible soap opera based in space".

The "soap opera" stuff was all Tarkovsky; Stanislaw Lem's original novel was more concerned with different kinds of topics (as a matter of fact, Lem was not satisfied at all with the direction the movie took).



"facts are stupid things" Ronald Reagan

reply

I wasnt crazy about the film, but the book is some of the best sci-fi has to offer.

Most smart alien stories are about how we handle contact, and is more about humanity than the aliens.

Solaris the book is about how aliens may be beyond our comprehension, and that communicaton would teach us nothing. This destroys the "us/them" philosophy of almost all other science fiction.

Science fiction is a vehicle to an interesting thought or psychology, and lasers and spaceships are very rarely the point. If they ARE the point, they arent scifi, they're fantasy.

reply