Paedophilia?
Barbara Bouchet's character.
Do you think she is a paedophile, or just a bored and self-satisfied upper class gal?
I like to think she is. But it is more likely your second suggestion.
.
MovieChat Forums > Non si sevizia un paperino (1972) Discussion > Paedophilia?
[deleted]
"bored and self-satisfied upper class gal"
Also the boys aren't really kids anymore. They smoke, they obviously are exploring their sexuality. Plus in Italy the age of consent is 14.
Did you ever notice that people who believe in creationism look really un-evolved? - Bill Hicks
14 really cool
you will have to forgive the lack of full stops lack of proper spelling im dyslexic but not stupid
I think she might have been a pedophile. Not only did she tell the one kid to look at her while she was completely nude and ask him if he'd like to go to bed with her, but she also asked the kid that changed her tire if he'd like a kiss instead of money. I think that goes way too far to just be having fun.
Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.
Women aren't pedophiles
shareActually, you're mistaken. Any adult can be a pedophile no matter what gender they are.
Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.
Traitor, you just don't know much at all, do you?
shareI spotted a grammatical error in your post. The word "don't" is past tense, whereas the word "did" is present tense. Make up your mind whether you are speaking of the present or the past.
Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.
Umm, if you're going to be a smartass language cop then please at least be correct. "Don't" is a contraction of "do not", which is clearly not past tense. Same words but past tense would be "didn't" (did not).
You failed.
LOL, why? Because I said women are rarely pedophiles? (which is true) She liked seeing adolescent boys trolling over her. That does not make her attracted to them.
When I was 14, being in that boy's skin at the begining of the movie was my dream. The one who thinks an attractive adult woman revealing herself to a teenage boy is child abuse needs to have his head examined.
lol i wish that happend to me when i was 14
you will have to forgive the lack of full stops lack of proper spelling im dyslexic but not stupid
So I guess an attractive adult man revealing himself (akin to the scene in the film) to a teenage girl isn't child abuse?
I myself would say not (but I'm not a sexist hypocrite), and I also don't think she is a paedophile as that would mean she "mainly" finds pre-pubescent children attractive (I know in modern culture morons think finding a 14yr old attractive makes someone a "paedo", when it just means they find a 14yr old attractive, nothing more), I think she is a rich bitch who while in a boring town, where the local women dislike her due to the way she dresses and looks, likes power control. That’s not to say she wouldn't *beep* one of the boys in the film, but a homosexual man will rape a woman as an act of power control, its doesn't mean he fancies the woman, its about dominance and in the film Bouchet can get her tyre changed by simply giving a boy a kiss instead of money, so why not?
It is NOT true that women are rarely pedophiles. What IS true is that people, particularly men, do not typically make as big of a deal about it. Kind of a double standard, isn't it?
____________________________
http://thrill-me.net
It is NOT true that women are rarely pedophiles. What IS true is that people, particularly men, do not typically make as big of a deal about it. Kind of a double standard, isn't it?
I think the reason is because there are no consequences* for a teenage boy if he engages in that type of activity, but there could be a number of them for a teenage girl.
As for Barbara Bouchet, while it would be 100% wrong - no ifs, ands, or buts - it would be almost impossible for a young teen to pass up something as sumptuous as she was back then if she offered her body to him.
* Being a potential father at that age usually gets ignored. 😃
No blah, blah, blah!
share
I think the reason is because there are no consequences for a teenage boy if he engages in that type of activityUnder USA law, the boy would be legally liable for child support until his offspring turns 18. There's also the issue of distraction. A boy in a sexual relationship or occupied by sexual obsession is less likely to finish high school or go on to college. And he's more likely to face a career of menial jobs, all because of early sexual molestation. Just because something feels good to you, doesn't mean that it's good for you. share
If i was 14 years old again i would love this women to pedophile me HA
shareI only know I would've loved to hit that at 13.
VIVA LA VINYL
[deleted]
Age of consent in Italy is 14, which is why these "children" are smoking and flirting with the idea of sex, because it's their coming of age where they can now have sex and smoke. Different countries, different rules. In fact, in Canada and many parts of the U.S. the age of consent is 16. It's all about perception. If you grow up with the perception of something being wrong, then it is wrong and therefore you shouldn't do it. Perception is a major factor in maturity.
I became sexually active when I was around 13 years of age, but I felt it was wrong, growing up in a conservative Christian family, so I wasn't comfortable bragging about sex until I was in my early 20s. It wasn't illegal for me to have sex at the age of 18, but it was wrong in my mind, therefore wrong for people to have sex with me because I was not emotionally mature in my perceptions of sex.
Interesting to consider that your own view point does not decide the morality of other people, as the region they grow up in and their own personal experiences are what determines their ethics.