MovieChat Forums > The Mechanic (1972) Discussion > BRONSON at his peak: one of THE action-m...

BRONSON at his peak: one of THE action-movies of all time ! - a comment


Unfortuentaly the IMDB comment-section only allows for 1000 words. Often this is NOT ENOUGH to put a picture into perspective and to do a picture justice by giving it the detailed analysis it deserves. My comment is longer than 1000 words, but of course there could still be said more about it than I do.

So I decided to put it onto the message board and hope to see some "fellow-fanatics" giving their input.

Here we go:

The early 70ies were the years, when CHARLES BRONSON as leading man could do nothing wrong. Every single movie he made in those years from 1970's CITTA VIOLENTA to 1975's BREAKHEART PASS was a commercial winner all the way and most of them were artistically successful as well. He worked with the best of western- and action-directors then (Michael Winner, Don Siegel, Terence Young, Tom Gries, Richard Fleischer, John Sturges, Sergio Sollima) and they usually turned out their best efforts with THE MAN starring in the leading role.

Whereas Clint EASTWOOD usually played (sophisticated) at-war-with-the-system cops these days (Dirty Harry 1 to 3, Gauntlet, Coogan's bluff), BRONSON was the man on the other side of the law, the down-to-earth-guy, the melon farmer at war with the mafia in MR. MAJESTYK, the vigilante Indian in CHATO'S LAND, the professional hit-man in THE MECHANIC, the street fighter in HARD TIMES, the adventure-pilot and prison-break-aid in BREAKOUT, etc ... and he looked GREAT in all these parts!

Those were the days! THE MAN was no. 1 at the box-office world-wide, the "sexiest man alive" (in his 50ies !!!), the epitome of masculinity and coolness. Especially the Japanese were crazy for him, his rugged face was displayed on one of the highest Japanese buildings many stories high.

That was deservedly so! The movies THE MAN turned out then one after another are now considered among the best of its kind ever made.

THE MECHANIC is clearly no exception to this rule. On the contrary, among his superb movies of these (sadly long gone) days, THE MECHANIC shines as one of the best. Some even consider THE MECHANIC to be the best movie Mr. BRONSON ever made! Personally I would no go that far, but it is definitely one of the best five he ever made, the others being HARD TIMES aka THE STREETFIGHTER (please also check my comment there), CHATO'S LAND (again, please check my comment there), of course DEATH WISH I and MR. MAJESTYK.

Actually THE MECHANIC is more than just a mere action-flick, it is a socio-economical study of the lives and times of a top-level professional hit-man at the peak of his power and his connections and ultimately fateful troubles with the mafia and mafia-structures. It is a so matter-of-fact-made movie that one can not deny its "documentary-style".

BRONSON looks GREAT as the "mechanic", the top-hit-man, the "killer of killers"! He's superbly clothed, always apt to the needs of the scene, wears suits and tie here and there, casual clothes in other occasions and an awesome leather-jacket in other memorable scenes. And the hair-cut is awesome as well (when have you seen a professional hit-man with that long hair?). BRONSON hardly ever looked better. When he left us in 2003, newspapers over here often chose pictures of him in his prime from the early 70ies, some taken from THE MECHANIC, him holding the ultimately fateful glass of wine in his huge hands. Memorable, ain't it? :-)

Back to the picture itself:

Right from the beginning THE MECHANIC is filled with awesome frames. Just take the first one: one sees just blue sky. Suddenly - seemingly from the nowhere - Bronsons stony face fills the screen (one has to see this on a BIG screen!). Jerry Fieldings superbly fitting music (now on on CD by Intrada) starts right the same second. We see THE MAN entering a building. A short greeting follows (which is the only word spoken in the first app. 15 minutes). Then the professional does his first job, knocks off his first victim, whose murder is disguised as a gas explosion, without emotion, just a job to be done. Then the murder of Harry McKenna follows, where Bishop shows no outward regret for his actions, putting the brutal demands of his job over his friendship to Harry.

ARTHUR BISHOP is certainly no average hit-man. He lives in a swell mansion up at Mulholland drive, the paintings on this wall are reproductions of Hironimus Boschs' work, when he plans the best way to do his jobs = killings, he listens to classical music, the furniture is well chosen, he loves a glass of wine after a well-done job. A man with manners and good taste. Not a dumb-ass, a clever hit-man, one with brains. His Dad already worked for the mafia (as a judge, in fact). A man with roots.

Emotionless, tough and quiet (but when he says something, then it's well thought-over), he is nevertheless intelligent enough to know, that this ain't a job he can do forever, that he is in the twilight of his career. So he decides to take a companion/apprentice, young J.-M. Vincent (in his best role), to teach him the trade and to have somebody to be able to rely on in dangerous situations. THE MAN ain't that young anymore, a 2nd man could be a needed asset, a backup in dangerous situations.

The mafia disapproves of this, but Arthur Bishop is strong-willed ...

Bronson and Vincent fill their parts to perfection and these ain't easy parts. Character development, not too usual for this genre, is a strong point of this movie together with a handful of superbly staged action-sequences. At a running-time of a little over 90 minutes, there is more happening in THE MECHANIC than in many other movies, and still you are not watching a hectic movie (like most action flicks today are). As another admirer wrote "'The Mechanic' is a tightly-bound drama that uses everything - dialog, emotion, physical action - with stunning economy. Like a tightly-written novel, the film sheds all unnecessary padding and only gives us what is absolutely important to the storyline."

This ain't a lightweight picture, this is prime stuff. Every frame is well-chosen, every scene has its meaning, Mr. Winner clearly put a lot of effort into this one (as well as his other efforts from the early- to mid-70ies - Winner became a slob only later on). There are not many pictures, which one can watch every second year and still be filled with thrill, but THE MECHANIC accomplishes this, it is a movie "that updates itself each time you watch it".

Watch it ! :-)

reply

Well stated WMJAHN and a interesting read if I do say myself. I don't know where you are from, but last Friday night (3/21/08) we were treated here in Hollywood Ca to a rare screening of "The Mechanic" at the Silent Movie Theater.

"The Mechanic" looked awsome on the big screen. The DVD is nice (I own a copy) but pales in comparison. The sound was much better as well.

It was also nice to see (not surprisingly) a decent turn-out for this great film that included in its numbers some "A" list Hollywood directors and some industry insiders as well.

I'm sure they were there to either rip it off or think about remaking it.

Cheers.

reply

Thank you VERY MUCH for your kind an interesting comment, I appreciate it a lot !

I think only in the last few years - also thanx to forums such as the IMDB and of course due to DVD-releases - Charles Bronson´s early 70ies efforts (which were buried under his unfortunately ruined repuation "thanx to" all those poor Goran-and-Globus productions from the 80ies, sigh) are finally getting the reputation (again), which they deserve. :-)

I am from Austria, Europe and I am truly happy to read that you have been able to attend one of the rare screenings of THE MECHANIC on a BIG screen. It does indeed make a difference (and a big one, if I may say so) to watch such a classic on big screen and I still very well remember my first (also big screen) viewing of this classic, even in which cinema I was then (it does still exist today, altough it is NOT a multiplex, haha). Fond memories, indeed !

Yeah, unfortunately - although it is good to see these movies out on DVD - they don´t get the presentation there, which they deserve. At least some trailers, audio-comment, maybe a rare interview with Chuck (I know, he did only very few). Deleted scenes are most likely not possible, since M. Winner always was a very economical director (at least he says so and it is also stated so in the book about the DEATH WISH-series), that hardly anything landed on the cutting floor. But then again, the movie is perfect as it is, where could there have been anything cut? :-)

Great to read that also some guys from the industry were there, I am pretty sure they enjoyed it. May I be curious and ask whom you did see (no problem if you can´t tell)?

Tarantino is a fan of this movie, as I am sure you know anyway, he copied the Bronson death-scene in KILL BILL (I think it was in part no. 2), there it is the scene with the snake. :-)

If I may, I would recommend also checking out HARD TIMES (it´s fantastic !!!) and CHATO´S LAND (you will be awed by the physical presence of THE MAN !).

Cheers and have a great day !!

reply

WMJAHN...check your IMDB private message account. Corresspondence to your last post on this thread there.

reply

Thanx for the great mail, it was really a joy to read and answer it !!!

reply

Great, enthusiastic post as always.

Consilio et prudentia

reply

Hi Wmjahn,
great write-up on a criminally underrated film. The Mechanic also played with Mr. Majestyk at the New Beverly Theater in L.A. a few months back (maybe a couple of years ago; can't recall.) I never thought Mr. Majestyk was in the same league as the Mechanic -- was not as well directed and, IMHO, is just not as interesting.

ANYWAY, I was at the same screening on 3/21/08 at the Silent Movie Theater. The previous poster was correct - it was well received and Quentin Tarantino brought Drew Barrymore to the theater to watch it! How cool is that?

I haven't seen the remake, not sure I want to. Who could possibly be as cool as Bronson?

reply

Thank you very much for your kind comment, chas77.

I am happy to read that some people do realize what a great picture THE MECHANIC actually is! Many critics always disregard Michael Winner as a director, the same way as they disregard Bronson as an actor who had just one expression (how ridiculous), but they are plain wrong.

THE MECHANIC (and CHATOS LAND) are superbly written studies of male behaviour and loyalty in an environment (the mafia in MECHANIC, the wilderness/desert in CHATOS LAND), which does not allow any mistakes. I am absolutely sure, that a lot of thought went into the scripting, directing and acting of both pictures and that the WINNER/BRONSON-teaming is one that ranks as high as the EASTWOOD/SIEGEL-cooperation. But it just ain´t "culture-politically correct" to praise the efforts of this director/leading man-teaming.

I am happy that from todays directors Tarantino (and he´s maybe not the only one, but the only one who admits it) does give Winner/Bronson their due and that he invites other people from the movie-industry to share these movies with him, because otherwise there´d be indeed the danger that they could slip into oblivion (too many movie-goers are in fact movie-illiterates, whose horizon does not go back further than Star Wars).

I have not seen the re-make either and actually don´t care to. I have seen too many re-makes, which went awefully wrong, although in a few cases the intentions were not just exploitative. I have seen the trailer, which was in fact enough for me. As you correctly write "who could possibly be as cool as Bronson" and the answer is: shamefully not one of todays leading men. It is not only his looks, which makes Bronson probably the toughtest of all hard men ever, but also his reduced style of acting, which was more common back then (I just say: Robert Mitchum, who had a compareable style of acting) and which art of "less is more" has been lost when over-acting became the norm in the middle to later 70ies. A glance from Bronson from under his eyebrows says more than e.g. DeNiro or DiCaprio ever could, and this ultra-male (in contrast to metro-sexual) behavior makes him the coolest guy I have ever seen on screen (even an inch cooler than Steve McQueen was).

And last but not least, yes, Mr. MAJESTYK ain´t the same level as MECHANIC, CHATO´S LAND or HARD TIMES (and a couple more), but it is still a pretty decent work from another disregarded director, who made better pictures than one would expect from his reputation (SOYLENT GREEN, THE LAST RUN, BANDIDO, VIOLENT SATURDAY, etc). I am happy that some cinemas/theatres still show these great efforts on a double bill. :-)

Sorry for my long comment, I was carried away. :-))



reply


Thank you, wmjahn. Great dissertation.
Hard Times is my favorite starring vehicle, for Charlie. Great debut for Walter Hill, too.

Carpe Noctem!

reply

Hiya Rogers,

Thanx for your kind comment!

If you have some time to spare, you are happily invited to read my "dissertations" :-) on HARD TIMES (I LOVE this movie, it is Bonson in his maybe most zen-like performance and the way Walter Hill lets the story unfold, is just marvellous), CHATO´S LAND (another pleasure of mine) and MR. MAJESTYK. Bronson was at his peak at that time and simply couldn´t do wrong, all his late-60ies to mid-70ies movies are great.

I am a BRONSON- fan(atic) :-), there are no actors like him today anymore (sigh).

reply

I intended to read your other dissertations, but got distracted.

Walter Hill is one of the great under-utilized directors in Hollywood, IMHO. The Driver is another fave.

The only criticism I ever heard about Hard times was from a friend, back when it first came out. He was a train buff & said the #s on the boxcars weren't appropriate, for the period. LOL.

Carpe Noctem!

reply

WM Jahn....

Good to read your dissertations here on IMDB once again. They are always most welcome. Hope your well and having a great 2011 !!

BTW, the re-make sucks. See ya here on the IMDB !!!

reply

Wmjahn, you got so many things right in your well written comments. This film i underrated as Bronson himself is. Seems like we never get actor like Bronson any more, male actors who actually look and behave like MEN. What we have these days are androngynous "cute" types like Leonardo Di Caprio, Matt Damon and Johnny Depp. A shame.

reply

Very well said, Rusty! A shame indeed! :-(

MEN are not allowed to be men anymore, to behave like men, to stand tall and proud and do what has to be done. That is reflected by the cinema, but the roots are in our society: in a) the damn thing that is called "political correctness", b) in the way the economy works and c) in todays politics.

a) Today everybody wants to be part of a "fringe/marginal group" (to show how poorly repressed one is) and the largest such group are women (at least they say they are). In the battle of sexes for power weakening men is one of womens strategies. They wanna make men like women, to behave weakly, to put on make-up, to shave and smell by using deodorant, to be submissively polite in every second by always thinking at what may I and what may I not say. That makes men weak. Real men in those glorious days back then didn´t need any of this *beep* they were not androngynous (yep, that´s the word for most of todays "men", unfortunately) and they were proud to say and do what they thought to be right.

b) Of course the economy is happy to jump on this bandwagon. They LOVE to sell all these *beep* "beauty-products" to men (who needs beautiful men???), because of course this doubles their potential sales. But economy needs whimps in another way, too. No company likes men, who behave proud and strong. Weaklings and whimps are much easier to guide, to influence, to milk. They don´t questions decisions, they do what they are asked to do.

c) These "assets" of todays "men" are also loved by all politicians worldwide. To have a herd of weak sheeps, who do what they are asked to do, who don´t mind the state intruding in their private life, who do not mind being monitored wherever they are (at work by computers, outside by cameras, via their handy and so on), are much easier to influence and "guide" than proud and strong men.

Can you imagine Charles Bronson (or any of the other great male actors back then like James Coburn, the early Clint Eastwood, Steve McQueen, Robert Mitchum and many more) to accept such a role-model for men? Of course we both agree that the answer to this is unquestionable "no"!

Of course this is just my opinion, but it is my strong believe, that the above factores are the reason why we don´t have actors who can honestly be called "MEN" anymore. We have a few, who try to act like men (this guy from the UK, eg), but it´s obvious they are just posers. And most male actors today have a dick but no guts, all of them pimps, sad but true.

reply