Donaldson's 'Getaway' is an example of remake really close to original without altering almost anything. It was shot primarily to boost the career of new happy couple Baldwin-Basinger at that time and offers not much but their hot love scene. The storyline sticks to the original all the way till the end, so if you saw the original there is absolutely no need to see the remake.
I saw the remake before the original. It wasn't as bad as people made it out to be. I think it helped that Donaldson followed the script page-per-page and didn't see the orginal before hand. Anybody could've played Baldwin and Bassinger parts but I really liked Tilly who showed to me that she could act while Madsen seen to be in "Mr. Blonde mode throughout.
The original, of course, crushes the insipid 1994 remake. But the one scene that shows this to be true is the part where Baldwin, Basinger, Madsen, and Seymour-Hoffman are going over the robbery details. Missing from the '94 film is all of the tension, pacing, and meaningful pauses that made the Peckinpah version of the scene so great.
In the earlier film, we know from that scene that Doc (McQueen) and Rudy (Al Lettieri) do not get along. When Rudy shines the flashlight in Doc and Carol's face followed by McQueen's loading of his handgun which compels Lettieri to immediately turn off the light is nothing short of brilliant. We know more about Lettieri's Rudy than we'd ever know from Madsen's dopey take on the role twenty plus years later. The 1994 version plays the scene almost exactly the same except it's rushed and strictly by-the-numbers. No tension, no insight into characters, nothing.
It was shot primarily to boost the career of new happy couple Baldwin-Basinger at that time and offers not much but their hot love scene.
In spite of her hot nude scenes, I didn't think much of their take. Absurdly enough, because of PC rules, in the big confrontation after Beynon dies, they have an argument and she slaps HIM instead of the other way around... just because they didn't want to "glamorize" male assault on women. But it makes no sense to recast Doc McCoy" as a sensitive, new-age male, wrestling with his feelings during the middle of a heist gone wrong.
However, Philip Seymour Hoffman did add some life to the film. He played the Bo Hopkins character (Jackson) but he was sniffling constantly, like a cocaine addict. When he was introduced to Baldin's Doc, I thought, oh-oh, HERE'S a f--kup waiting to happen...
The only reason to make a remake, as we all know, is to capitalize on the existing "marquee value" of the original. There was no significant way to improve on the story.
reply share