The current head of the F.B.I. stated that the uptick in crime might be due to what he called 'The Fergeson effect'. This is the theory that patrol cops are now cowed into staying in their patrol cars, not wanting to be on the next You Tube/CBS news sensation.
If this is true, pro-active policing like the kind in this movie might be dead.
Interesting theory, but not quite accurate. Most police departments in the US have arrest quotas and many departments incentivize arrests with overtime pay, euphemistically called "collars for dollars." The processing of a perp and taking him to court is the bread and butter of the policeman. It's common practice in NYC, for a detective to make his arrests towards the end of an eight hour tour to maximize his overtime pay. Over the course of a year, a cop can earn $10-30,000 in overtime. Maybe a year's college tuition for their child.
There are, indeed, instances where a cop will avoid unnecessary risk. For instance, if called to a crime, and say, the cop catches a suspect who is bleeding, more than likely the cop will summon an ambulance rather than take the suspect into custody where he would have to explain the suspect's injury to superiors. That never happened years ago.
As you say, "pro-active" policing was the norm in the days of THE FRENCH CONNECTION. But even then, it would have been unlikely that Doyle would have pistol-whipped the drug pusher out in the open as he does early in the film. Police were more noted for taking the suspect back to the precinct's basement or interrogation room for a private session in behavioral modification. A major abuse of cops of the 60s and 70s was the use of the "flake." That is, when frisking a suspect, a cop would plant the drugs in the suspect's pocket. Later, during a second frisk, a fellow officer would find the drugs and substantiate the charge.
Couple things...police departments do not have 'arrest quotas', true promotions and overtime do come into play but having a quota could lead to false arrests and lawsuits for the city. Cops are union, the pressure on arrests is peer related (being labeled a 'slug'). Please find me a police handbook anywhere that states a quota...defense lawyers would have a field day with it!
You are confused as to what I mean by pro-active policing. Simply put, it is stopping and questioning people using reasonable suspicion and cop instincts that 'that guy is dirty' (to quote Popeye Doyle). With the advent of cell phone video cameras cops might not want to stop that person for fear of the interaction going south and being filmed.
It is not MY theory, this is the head of the FBI who came up with the 'Fergeson effect', and it is pretty ballsy to say to a person who knows more about it than you or me that 'it is not quite accurate'.
I don't want to open up a heated debate since I don't have any particular interest in either side of the debate, but I do enjoy making snarky comments, so here it goes:
This pro-active policing of which you speak, is that why the early 70's were so crime free? Why New York was at its pinnacle of cleanliness and order?