The business of naming after someone using only the first letter really isn't as simple as that. People *do* do that, but it's not always without controversy. I can think of two instances in my own family:
My sister named her son "Daniel", and at least once claimed to have named him after our great uncle Dave. However, some in my family (including myself, and, if I recall correctly, my mother), thought this was a crock, because why then didn't she name him "David"? The general feeling was that, since both "Daniel" and "David" are both perfectly good biblical Jewish names, that using just the first letter wasn't good enough. Now, if our uncle had been named "Durwood" or "Dewey" or something, we probably would have bought it.
Similarly, my cousin had a son not long after my grandfather died, whose name was "Benjamin". She named the son "Billy" and I believe claimed he was named after our grandfather. But my grandmother went to her grave bitter about this choice, saying "What was wrong with 'Benny'?"
A lot of it, though, has to do with the *Hebrew* name the child is given. Often the Hebrew name and the English name don't match, but usually (not always) the first letter will at least match. Thus, my first name is "Richard", but my Hebrew name is "Raphael". My father's name is "Robert", but his Hebrew name is "Rueben" ("Ruevain"). Interestingly, my naming is broken-yet-correct in that I'm supposed to be named after my great grandfather, but his name was also "Ruevain", and the Rabbi that my parents consulted said that you can't name a child "Reuvain ben Reuvain" ("Reuben son of Reuben"). So I ended up stuck with the Hebrew name "Raphael", which doesn't belong to *anyone* in my family. :-S
reply
share