I do not see Mitchell as perfectly fitting into The Who as we know it. Sure, he could have done so—he was talented enough musically—but as the previous poster noted, Mitchell's style was heavily influenced by modern jazz, by such game-changing bebop drummers as Kenny Clarke and Max Roach. That dynamic worked well with Jimi Hendrix, who could solo and improvise on guitar like a great jazz horn player. The Who, conversely, lacked that element—the band's approach was much more compact and much less spontaneous and free-flowing (albeit increasingly operatic). Unlike The Rolling Stones, The Who was not bluesy, either—in contrast to Keith Richards (or Brian Jones, let alone Mick Taylor), Pete Townsend certainly could not pass for a blues or rhythm-and-blues guitarist. Thus Keith Moon's streamlined, whipping power worked very well for The Who yet would not have optimally complemented Hendrix, who was a blues guitarist at his core and one with jazz-like improvisational virtuosity. For a guitarist with so much nuance and range, Mitchell, conversely, constituted a great complement.
By the way, in addition to Michtell and Charlie Watts, The Doors' drummer, John Densmore, was also heavily influenced by jazz and thus really complemented the polish of keyboardist Ray Manzarek and the poetic elements of singer and chief lyricist Jim Morrison.
reply
share