wow, i had heard this movie was a classic, but i never saw it, now i...
i have no desire to see it. lol it looks like everybody hates it.
OUTTHERE
www.myspace.com/b2dv4
i have no desire to see it. lol it looks like everybody hates it.
OUTTHERE
www.myspace.com/b2dv4
I didn't hate it, it's one of my favorite films. I am not sure why so many people dislike it. I think it's worth taking a look at and making up your own mind. Especially keeping in mind that the film is over 30 years old.
shareExactly. Besides, classics should be watched/read/listened... whatever, because it lies in the foundation of contemporary culture.
shareWell, at the time, this was a fresh type of love story. This was the new youth movement in movie storytelling. We can all agree melodrama has evolved tremendously in HOW it's told since the dawn of cinema.
It's the boy hates girl, girl hates boy, boy and girl fall in love, get married, hello terminal illness, girl dies, boy is left alone, tragedy. It's been done MANY MANY times.
In this tradition of young love (with *young* being the key word), before the "Love Story"(71) wave was the Zeffirelli "Romeo and Juliet"(68), before that was "The Graduate"(67). These three fall into that late-60s to early-70s cusp.
Before that were those happy fun Elvis Hawaii, Frankie and Annette, Gidget bikini swimsuit beach surf party love stories of the early 60s. (A funny turn considering the teen movies before these.)
Before that were the young Natalie Wood-in-the-lead era of the late-50s to the start of the 60s with "Splendour in the Grass"(61) and "West Side Story"(61). A lot of artfully and sexually charged young people. One being a word-heavy-drama and the other set in contemporary-music (of that time).
((This is the same time where the "adults" were watching "Breakfast at Tiffany's", "Houseboat" and the Doris Day movies. Kind of like those happy-go-lucky-try-not-to-mention-sex-but-IMPLY-sex-wink-wink love stories.))
Before that, the heights of the mid-50s was "Peyton Place"(57) and "Rebel Without a Cause"(55) with that miserable-suburban-kids-in-love theme. Although 'Peyton Place' wasn't entirely about youths, the youths within the film definitely struck a chord with its young audience.
Before that, in the start of the 50s has to be "A Place in the Sun"(51); one of the BIG starters of the doomed-love theme for the young movie audience.
Before that was all of that Andy Hardy, Mickey Rooney + Judy Garland "oh golly" love stories with tons of dance and music.
So now you can kind of see how "Love Story" came about and really affected the audience of the 70s.
Heck, I know a lot of people that have returned to "Titanic" and could NOT believe the hype of it. But we see the elements that lead up to the majesty of Titanic in its technical and cinematic achievements.
However, now we see young-people-love-stories becoming small-scale again with lower budgets, less glitz and a lot of irony in the screenwriting.
As for "Love Story", if you don't enjoy it in the context of today, all we can do is appreciate the film as how it was portrayed at the time. Imagine if they kept making beach-surf-party romper movies.
"Love Story" was the first of its kind AT that time.
i still appreciate it now.
sharePerfectly put.....couldn't add anything better. Thanks
shareReally gives more understanding to a 16-year old movie lover who was told this was a classic....
share
well,it's not actually what you can call a real "classic" in the meaning of "known and appreciated by the vast majority".
this movie have a big flow: the timing plot construction. i mean,the gap between the guy happly taking a shower and joking with his friends and the sickness of her is really a too big one. too much a time jump.
same for her death.
except for that she is marvelous and the movie is touching and moving.
someone agree with my point? (and sorry for my bad english).
[deleted]
Love Story came out when I was in 6th grade and was a smash box office hit. I call it a "classic" in the sense that it captures a universal theme. The movie is flawed but the intent is still the same: to touch the viewer emotionally. It is really quite simple.
The matching of music and picture for the two popular scenes (snow frolic and walk to the taxi) fit the intent simply and beautifully.
I particularly like the natural scenes of the campuses (Harvard and Radcliffe) which highlight the wonderful, vibrant fall colors and raw winter landscapes.
To make a comparison, the film Titanic would basically tower above Love Story. The former weaves a much longer, captivating plot and stunning visuals which cater to the modern audience. It utilizes superior technical film making technology. It boasts two actors who were perfectly suited for Titanic. How can Love Story possibly measure up to that?
When one looks at films that encapsulate the basic theme of love and love lost, I think one has to put the majority of such films in the category of "classic" because the theme never goes away. The truly great films (i.e. Dr. Zhivago) appeal to the same emotions, by and large, but represent filmmaking at the highest level. Love Story does not fit into that realm.
I was eight when it came out. Of course, this movie was totally forbidden. Didn't get to see this movie until I was an adult.
It's a classic because by this generation, almost everybody and their aunt has seen this movie at least once, if not heard of it.
Wow, how sad. Someone who bases their opinions on movies from total strangers.
shareSee this movie. Dont bother yourself with other people's comments. Movies are absolutly about personal taste. You have to be a moron and un romantic to dislike the movie.
This movie does not contain anything un-realistic. This story can be a part of anyone's life.
This movie is one of the most realistic romantic dramas. If people can love "A walk to remember" then why not this one.
Best part of the movie is, its cast. Both the leads are not great looking but both have a romantic appeal.
Love Story is a movie that can be judged from its cover or reviews. It is the story of the most simple and uncomplicated form of love i.e. ( love someone, get married without anyones support.
I am from India , never like any movie beyond the 80's era except two "Love Story" & "Breakfast At Tiffinys".
I saw this when it first came out. You either loved it or hated it. I hated it. And I am not above liking weepers. I saw it again recently. Maybe I would change my mind. I didn't. It is a little bit better but not by much. I don't hate it anymore. I just am not crazy about it. I have seen much better love storys in movies, even back in 1970 when this came out And I will give the reason I did not like it the first time and still does not like it and what I heard from other people who did not like it, The character of Jenny.
A movie like this for it to work you have to care about the characters and what happens to them. He was ok, but I hated her. I am not sure if she was suppose to be playing a working class women or Ali McGraw was just a bad actress. I read the book and liked it. But she ruined the move. I could care a less if the character died or not. I believe the supporting players were very good. And I believe the conflict with his father was much more interesting then their story and I wish they would focused on that more because the love story in Love Story was a dud. But I must say I felt so bad for the her father, John Marley was so good in the movie. And Ray Milland was excellent in the small part he had as his snooty dad. Ryan over acts. Tommy lee Jones is in the movie and he was Al Gores roommate at Harvard. I heard rumors the story was based on another one of their room mates. I hope not
[deleted]
I like the movie, but marbleann, you bring up an interesting point with the conflict between Oliver and his father. It would have been interesting if they explored it a bit more, but I guess it would take away from the main focus of the story.
shareErich Segal wrote the screenplay first then the book though the book came out before the movie. This is why the story of the father/son relationship is explored further in the book than in the movie. The movie seems rushed but if you like the story, read the book. All the actors were good in the movie - especially the fathers. And the music is wonderful. Heck, I even liked Oliver's Story which a lot of people hated. Segal's Man, Woman & Child was a good book that just didn't translate well into a movie.
"Jesus died for somebody's sins, but not mine." Patti Smith - Gloria.
[deleted]
It's perhaps THE dumbest love movie I've ever seen. I saw Annie Hall. Love it. I saw When Harry Met Sally. Love it. I even like The Notebook and A Walk to Remember. Oh, did I also mention that I am a 22yr old dude? And somehow, those movies were moving enough to make me love them. Yet... I thought this movie was a classic, and, thusly, GOOD. But no. Love Story was like the writer and director take a bunch of romance movie cliches and dumb s*** they think the audience would fall in love with, put them all in a blender, blend them all together to get this movie. Sigh...
share