no exageration, I really think this is one of the overall best movies ever made. Its freakin fantastic. Best cinematography in ANY film. PERIOD. I guess its a bit ignorant to say best ever, but it for sure will be in the top 5 list in objective lists. I just love anything to do with facism so thats why I put it at number one. Im also a cinematography nut. But still, the characters, the acting, the staging, and the writing was all number one! (although its hard to argue best scripts)
Conformista is one of the classics, and along with Last Tango are the only two Bertolucci films I really treasure.
The film just pulls you along; the tracking is fluid and organic, the performances pitch-perfect despite the bad dubbing. And of course the "Plato's cave" image at the end is one of the finest endings in cinema.
I've only seen it twice. It confounds, amazes, enthralls, mystifies, overcomes.... This is a film that I will spend a lifetime trying to come to terms with. I'm overwhelmingly intrigued. I'm breathless. The cinematography is beyond anything I've ever seen. I just cannot believe this is 1970. Wow! What an experience this film is. Bertolucci is vastly overlooked, imho. Last Tango and this film are monumentally great.
I was on the verge to start the same thread without even looking at the existing ones when in the last moment I saw it already exists. Just finished watching this for the first time and was blown away. So this was Bertolucci before he made nice little films like "Io ballo da sola" ... sheer genius. I can't remember having been so impressed by a film in a long time.
Glad I didn't come here and saw this thread prior to watching the film, though ... it might have pushed my expectations to I don't know what heights that might have lead to disappointment, who knows, although at present I cannot imagine such a thing happening. There's one comment in this thread here that amused me: someone was surprised that the film was made in 1970 - as if great cinematography were a matter of the decade a film was made :), and 1970 certainly wasn't the stone age of cinema!
As much as I love and admire Fellini, now I start to wonder why only he is discussed so much on these boards and this film isn't. I mean, why has "La Strada" ~ 10.600 votes (deservedly so, no doubt) as compared to ~ 3.600 for "Il Conformista"? There's clearly something out of balance here.
A masterpiece if there ever was one. I realize that this term is used too loosely most of the time, by myself as well. This film changes the standards.
i tend not to worry about who discusses what on these boards... ratings and votes don't matter and are completely arbitrary. what i do like is the ability of a place like this, in the valleys between all the massive amounts of junk discussion, to find compatriots in small niches such as this one, with whom to commiserate over the unappreciated beauty or brilliance of a particular piece.
I won't argue about the quality of the cinematography. It is exceptional. The film is highly stylized and I can see why many opinions on its quality would be seduced by this, however, I personally felt the first third of the film was disappointing. The flashbacks made the story incoherent in my view. From that point the story is told chronologically and I enjoyed it thereafter. A good film with excellent cinematography. Bertolucci cannot seem to tell a simple story in a straightforward way.
There is so much a viewer can take from The Conformist in its context and on a visual level that it would take more than one viewing to gain a full understanding of the film, which is something I appreciate. It is a great example of sophisticated visual and in depth piece of art.
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not".