MovieChat Forums > Catch-22 (1970) Discussion > How close was this to the book Catch-22?

How close was this to the book Catch-22?


Cause you know...
I have to read the book which is 500 pages long and write a 5-7 page essay on it...
In 4 days...

reply

anyone...

reply

Yeah, the film was not close enough to fake it if you have an experienced teacher reviewing your essay. I suggest Cliff's/Cole's Notes or some marathion reading.

There's too many drastic differences between the book and the film to pretend one is the other. Different characters die different ways than in the film, Luciana wasn't quite as worked out in the book. Yossarian dated her and there's a relationship of sorts in there, but most of his pursuits were centered Nurse Duckett, some other Italian girls, and an Officer's wife when he was still a Cadet. Nately does have his whore and much of that relationship is fairly verbatim, but his death is much different. There were a lot of characters left out of the film that would be too integral in the book to leave out. Hope this helps.

reply

read the book dude, it's well worth it.

reply

Yeah, I agree with cwebb44.

It's got a lot similar parts, but to get the real idea you should read the book.

reply

By all means, read the novel. I was responding to how they needed to write an essay in less than five days about a book they haven't read yet. I never suggested for an instant that they shouldn't actually read the book. It's definitely a worthwhile read. I read it twice, myself. I didn't read it because someone told me I had to; I read it twice because I liked it.

reply

[deleted]

I read the book in college in the 70s, loved it (it's truly hilarious) and saw the movie when it first came out - I was disappointed because it just wasn't as complete as the novel. I just saw it again for the first time since then and appreciated it a lot more, but I still say the novel was way better, and contains hundreds of details that were not in the movie - yet all that detail just hangs together so well that it's a pleasure to read. I think I'm gonna read it again.

I know your assignment is over by now; I just wanted to talk about Catch-22 :-)

"Oh, Stewardess! I speak jive."

reply

I tried to read the book once a couple years ago and only got a hundred pages or so in, then gave up. Right around the chapter with Major ___ de Coverley. Then I decided to pick it back up again and I'm so glad I did... the book really takes off after the mission to Bologna.

One of my favorite parts of the book:
"Sure, that's what I mean," Doc Daneeka said. "A little grease is what makes this world go round. One hand washes the other. Know what I mean? You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours."
Yossarian knew what he meant.
"That's not what I meant," Doc Daneeka said as Yossarian began scratching his back.

reply

[deleted]

For everyone who was disappointed in the movie after having first read the book:
I have discovered, quite by accident, that I can enjoy both the book and the film (of any movie, not just Catch-22) if I see the movie first, and then read the book. I saw Catch-22, The Firm, and the Sean Connery-era James Bond films before I read the books, and enjoy both of them. I read Silence of the Lambs, Bourne Identity and Bourne Supremacy before seeing the movies. Though I enjoyed the movies, they let down my expectations, especially Bourne Supremacy; Marie did NOT get killed in the book.
Bottom line is Hollywood can never match the world you create in your mind while reading a book. Trouble is I love reading so much I get burned a lot seeing movies of books I love.

Peace,
Rick

PS: LOTR is a notable exception to the book-first disappointment syndrome.

reply

I read the majority of the book in three days. You can do it.

How can you document real life when real life's getting more like fiction each day?

reply