MovieChat Forums > Catch-22 (1970) Discussion > one of he worst Horrors of War

one of he worst Horrors of War


s that you have all these people who survive the War and then go on to write books about their experinces with a few touch ups here or there and then call it fiction, they change the name of a soldier they knew who might have been called Alvin Fedak, and change his name to Almer fodstocken, and that they think that transforms the story into anything other then just pure recollection.
I lose a lot of respect for writers who spend a lifetime writing about their life experiences and calling it fiction. As opposed to a genius like Herman Wouk or Tolstoy who had true imigination.

reply

As opposed to a genius like Herman Wouk
You apparently don't know squat about Wouk.

--
Some days, you just can't get rid of a bomb.

reply

You'd be extremely naive to not think Heller's experiences on the Italian front were a long way different from those of Yossarian. They weren't just memoirs with a few fictional touch-ups here and there.🐭

reply

From the title, I thought this topic was going to lament the men psychically torn asunder by their experiences; young lives with their hearts ripped out in their prime, leading to lives, some short and some long, all with souls tortured by memories the endurance of which cannot be comprehended by those lacking such experiences.

Catch 22 ably exposes this theme, but lots of movies do that (though few better). What is unique about this film is the shocking exposition of another horror of war. Namely, the way evil and bizarre conduct comes to be accepted and engaged in, just due to its prevalence. The scene where a bomber crashes catastrophically on landing, the brass completely oblivious to the ear-splitting noise and enormous spectacle of the explosion and fire directly behind them, while they continue in their conversation about trivia - it is eloquent.

reply

Dumb post.

reply