"True Grit" is a good movie (solid 8) with a great performance by Wayne (I think he deserved the Oscar), but one thing that has always tainted the film for me is the terrible performance by Glen Campbell. If only they'd gotten a decent actor for that role it would have been a much better movie. For some reason I always thought Clint Walker would have made a good La Beouf. I always pictured La Beouf as a big, strong, more soft-spoken type as opposed to the thinner, whiny-voiced Campbell. Any other ideas for actors who would have been better in the role?
A lot of people feel as you do. I thought he was ok for the part since the movie was mainly about Wayne and Darby. I feel Clint would have been too old because the Campbell character was only about 30 years old. Jon Voight and Jack Nicholson would have both been great for the part but Jon was making Midnight Cowboy and Jack was making Easy Rider and these movies were what made them into big time stars. Another actor that could have done a good job would have been Bruce Dern.
Good point about Walker. He was over 40 at the time. I agree Jon Voight would have been a good choice, though I just can't see Nicholson in the role. Not sure about Bruce Dern. They say they originally wanted Elvis but he turned it down. He might have been a little better than Campbell.
I watched TG again today and I just can't get over how bad some of Campbell's line deliveries are. "You'll push that saucy line too far." Ugh. Even worse is right before that line when he flatters the lady who runs the boarding house so he can speak privately to Matty Ross. Something about "I'm certain to miss your charming company, as I'm sure many men do, but please excuse us." Just horrible. I defy anyone to watch that scene and not cringe in embarrassment. Sorry Glen, you're a wonderful singer, but man your were a bad actor in TG.
From what I understand, Campbell wasn't real crazy about doing the movie either, and it soured him on doing others. Apparently he and the director did not get along well. At least, that's what they said on TCM.
If what killed Nicholson from doing this movie, should have also queered the deal for Dennis Hopper... right? Actually, this movie was shot before Easy Rider started filming, so there shouldn't have been a conflict for either actor. (Btw, Hopper and Wayne hated each other's guts, but they didn't allow their feelings to interfere with their performances.)
I was 13 years old when True Grit came out and even though I loved the movie, I thought even back then that Glen Campbell was terrible. To this day I can't even remotely fathom what the director was thinking. If it's so obvious to casual movie-goers how bad he is, how could the director not realize it? It just doesn't make any sense. How do you cast a non-actor in such a major role in a major motion picture? Are there any interviews on the DVD that shed any light on this mystery?
Agreed. My God criticizing Glen and then looking at today's crap is hilarious! All these cookie cutter crap actors today compared with two or three crappy reads from Glen. My my.
Glen Campbell was quite obviously not a world-class, big screen actor when he was cast in True Grit, but I disagree completely that the performance he turned in was awful. In my opinion, just the oposite was the case.
There are a number of different ways to look at this, forty years-on, and a number of different, then curent circumstances to look at when we consider the casting of Mr. Campbell in the role of La Beouf. First, we must recall that there were actually very few talents in 1968-1969 America that were any hotter than was Mr. Campbell. Especially new, young talent that wasn't expressly youth oriented. Mr, Campbell had a very broad apeal at that moment and I imagine any number of Hollywood producers were propbably more than a little anxious to exploit Mr. Campbell's popularity when True Grit was being cast. The part of the young Texas ranger had to have had all the ingredients of the perfect vehicle to introduce Mr. Campbell as a big-screen player. Both the actor and the character had much in common. Young, good looking and, most of all, each of their individual qualifications to successfully acomplish the job at hand were fairly unknown at the outset of both the film and the story. Glen Campbell also had a very obvious connection to all things Western through his music by the film's opening... even having hailed from Arkanas, the home of the fictional Matty Ross and her family.
Another similiraty between Campbell and La Beouf was their swaggering arogance. La Beouf's came through the novelist's pen and Campbell's.... well, who can say other than that it had to have taken considerable guts and self confidence for ANYONE to agree to share scene after scene after scene with the legondary John Wayne... especially for one with vertually zero acting experience as was the case with Mr. Campbell. True Grit? I'd say quite a bit on the part of both Mr Campbell AND Mr. Wayne... not to mention the studio to agree to attempt this particular on-screen pairing.
Overall, I think when you consider the fact that Mr. Campbell had never done any serious acting prior to True Grit, he turned in a pretty credible job and the film would not have had the charm that it turned out to have had he not co-starred in it. Mr. Campbell did more than OK in my humble opinion... he also added an element of risk and, perhaps even a slight hint of danger by his very casting in what has turned out to be widely regarded as one of Hollywood's last truly great classic westerns!
I understand "why" they cast him. He was popular at the time. He was a young, good-looking guy. He had the accent. He sang the title song. Those are the reasons "why" they cast him.
What I'm saying is his acting was horrible, and I think the film is the evidence.
the film would not have had the charm that it turned out to have had he not co-starred in it. Mr. Campbell did more than OK in my humble opinion... he also added an element of risk and, perhaps even a slight hint of danger by his very casting
You're entitled to your opinion, but to say Campbell added "charm", "risk", and "danger" to the movie . . . well, pardon me while I laugh into my hat. You must be related to Glenn.
I don't think that Glen Campbell was all that bad in the role, not great by any stretch of the imagination; however, Wayne and Darby shone and far outweigh what Campbell - or probably anyone else - could have done in the role. Elvis was supposedly a passing consideration, but I do think he would have been well enough cast and could have done a good job here, ditto Jon Voight.
...and, don't forget, the character of Le Boeuf is supposed to be a puffed-up, cocky, Texas Ranger, with fancy hair and noisy spurs and special gun and all. He's young and relatively inexperienced, chases after (younger) girls, back-talks to his elders, and sucks up to the old landlady. The old-English style of talking makes the character seem awkward; everybody has this problem and some of the audience stumble on that. This leads well into Campbell's personal style and screen inexperience. They wanted Eddie Haskell with a gun. What you're seeing is good acting; good enough to make you think it's bad acting.
. . Tenser, said the Tensor. Tension, apprehension, and dissension have begun.
Agreed. I don't think Campbell did a bad job at all. A couple lines were wooden, but he did pretty good overall. And Kim Darby's acting was by far the worst anyway...
actually Campbell wasn't bad, its just the i couldn't put the thought of 'GC-pop country crooner'-out of my mind-which brought me out of the movie. The Mattie seemed to be added to go for the 'Womens Lib' crowd-she wasn't too bad, but a little annoying
I just finished watching TG on TCM. Yes, Glen Campbell wasn't the greatest but I noticed that most of the characters had odd line readings, esp. for old west characters with minimal formal education. It's like the director was telling them "Enunciate, enunciate, don't mumble!"
Haha, this post caught my eye because I just watched this movie with my dad and we discussed Glen's performance. He told me that he saw an interview where Campbell said that he wasn't sure he could act before this movie, and after seeing himself in the movie he was still pretty sure he couldn't act.
I just saw a TV special with Campbell last weekend and he poked fun at how bad he was in it. But his rendition of the gorgeous title song cannot be argued. Lovely ballad, beautifully sung.
From what I've read, this was NOT a happy set. Wayne had health issues, drank in real life, and had no time to suffer fools. He was too much of a no-nonsense legend. But he had to contend not only with Campbell's insecurity and ego (Campbell was already a music legend and knew he was out of his element in an acting role), but with Darby, who was noted by many to be extremely difficult and aloof with The Duke. She was super talented and pretty much ruined her own career due to her mammoth bitchery. She also made the mistake of teaming with Campbell again the following year in the forgotten stinker "Norwood." Today she teaches acting. What a waste. She's sensational in the film.
For me, she nearly singlehandedly ruined this film with her one dimensional 'eogtistical' portrayal. This movie survives only on the strength of Wayne's performance.
Funny, I didn't see it that way at all. Especially considering Campbell wasn't a pro actor I thought he did a good job and I didn't have a problem with his La Beouf. His style was in good contrast with John Wayne.
Hah! All you folks who think Campbell is so awful in this flick I suggest you watch the following: Frankie Avalon in THE ALAMO Bobby Rydell in BYE BYE BIRDIE Mick Jagger in NED KELLY Bob Dylan in PAT GARRETT & BILLY THE KID
"A lot of people feel as you do. I thought he was ok for the part since the movie was mainly about Wayne and Darby. I feel Clint would have been too old because the Campbell character was only about 30 years old. Jon Voight and Jack Nicholson would have both been great for the part but Jon was making Midnight Cowboy and Jack was making Easy Rider and these movies were what made them into big time stars. Another actor that could have done a good job would have been Bruce Dern."
lol. I could picture Nicholson sticking his face through a crack in the door yelling "Heres La Boeuf!!!"
As I understand it, the producers originally wanted Elvis Presley to play La Boeuf, but ol' Col. Tom Parker wanted top billing, so they went with Campbell instead.
As ok an actor as Elvis was (I'm basing this on Flaming Star(I believe it was called, where he died in the movie) which as a result of, I tear up whenever I hear Love Me Tender), I really can't picture him in the role honestly.
Chase: Wow. Yeah, I get it. House is adorable. I just want to hold him and never let go.
I agree... Campbell's performance was GOD-awful. It really is the only sour note in the whole movie. Glen couldn't act a lick, and thankfully this movie pounded the coffin-nail into what was going to be his 'acting' career! It's said that Hathaway and Campbell didn't get on well together, during the shoot... and I can well imagine why. I just wonder who was twisting Hathaway's arm to give Campbell this role?
Elvis wanted this role and I think he would have done well with it. When Elvis Presley was given a good role he could act. Col. Parker made a lot of mistakes and screwed Elvis out of some very good movies. A Star Is Born was another one that he messed up for Presley. Elvis was suppose to be in "Rio Bravo" but he was drafted and missed out on that one too. I think if you would have gotten these parts it might of been just what he needed to save him. He wanted so much to prove himself in Hollywood. Too bad!
Campbell was new to acting and did a fine job for a newbie.
Just think how cool it would have been to have the Duke & The King in the same movie. If you remember Elvis was in the best shape of his life in 1969.