why did they oppose Colossus?


as Colossus says, the loss of freedom is simply hubris on the part of mankind. Colossus had no malevolence towards mankind, all it's decisions would be logical and in the best interests of man. War would not be permitted, problems would be solved ... so where was the beef man had with Colossus? Why did they immediately try to disarm it rather than (obey) and see where things led? I realize there's no movie if they simply go along with the dictates of Colossus, but am curious why nobody once said "so remind me again ... why is our knee-jerk reaction to try to regain control?"

reply

"as Colossus says, the loss of freedom is simply hubris on the part of mankind."

Humans are collectively hubristic. This is not likely to change any time soon. To be honest, I don't think many of us would be willing to be told what to do by a computer. At least, not in a major capacity. We don't mind having cars that can do the reverse parking for us. But if an artificial intelligence wants to control every facet of our lives, it's bound to feel... emasculating.

reply

the main hint (I can't think of the stronger word needed here) that there could be problems was Colossus demanding they vacate Crete to build something it felt was necessary. Others have suggested this was a little wink to the Colossus of Rhodes on the Greek island of Rhodes, and that the computer wanted some physical representation of itself. Which then immediately brings up the question: was Colossus now showing signs of ego, and therefore was now a god and not simply an impartial, logical 'device' that could help mankind. One would think in theory that Forbin could reason with his creation and explain why such and such was a bad idea ("check your history banks" i think was the line used a few times). That was never explored in the movie, Colossus simply took over and that was that.

As for "not willing to be told what to do", in a strong way we already are. Laws of course are #1 on that list, but virtually every day we are told "you can't do this" or "don't do that". I realize the concept of the movie was 'the fight', I'm just wondering if something was developed that could solve problems (eliminate war, poverty) but with conditions attached, if people would balk. They seemingly did so immediately in this movie.

reply

"I realize the concept of the movie was 'the fight', I'm just wondering if something was developed that could solve problems (eliminate war, poverty) but with conditions attached, if people would balk. They seemingly did so immediately in this movie."

I suppose it's that old "price of freedom" problem. If a government wanted to drastically reduce crime, it could force its citizens to stay home after dark, violation of the law being punishable by death. But this would mean living in a totalitarian state. At the moment people are free to walk the streets at night, even if it means the risk of being robbed by a gang of thugs. It's a compromise we make for our freedom of movement.

Colossus effectively wanted to make the world one big totalitarian regime, so it's natural enough that humans wouldn't stand for this. Eradicating war and poverty would be nice, but not if it means losing freedom in the process.

reply

First thing Colossus would do is start making plans for going mobile. The brain is guarded in the secure mountain.

It will control manufacturing and make robots that will extend it so it can make robot army and cops and guards.

That's loss of freedom for humans which we are evolutionarily programed to desire and seek.
Hence the opposition

reply