Been looking through Warhol's films and such...
210 minutes long???
I thought Lord of the Rings went on forever!
=Graham
210 minutes long???
I thought Lord of the Rings went on forever!
=Graham
That's nothing. I'm sure you know the running time of Empire and Sleep. 190-220min is just long enough.
share[deleted]
Theres many many good films which have a longer running time than that. Fanny and Alexander, Empire, Greed (originally), Napoleon, etc. The longer the film the better!
sharelongest film ever is "the cure for insomnia" and is 87 hours
shareYou forget about Douglas Gordon's "5 years drive-by," which, as the title suggests, is 5 years long.
shareI just saw "Chelsea Girls" today, screened at a really tiny art studio in Charlotte. They decided to project it in four images side-by-side and on top of each other (like one big square separated into four smaller squares) instead of just two images side-by-side. This cut the running time for the entire film down to 110 minutes. Now I've never seen the original 210-minute presentation, but I liked the four pictures and thought that this way was pretty cool. The projectionist had to choose which one of four audio tracks to play, so a lot of the dialogue was absent, but it wasn't really important anyhow so it doesn't seem like a big deal. The movie flowed well and I was never bored.
There were about twenty people in attendance and only three walked out. When the movie ended everyone was enthusiastic and gave it a big round of applause.
The presentation sounds reminiscent of the Marilyn pieces, as well as his later private portraiture in the 1980's.
share[deleted]
Too short.
share