I was just wondering about this iconic phrase in every episode of Dragnet. If they are innocent why should changing the names protect them unless they are ratting out Mafia bosses. If they are guilty then why not use the real names?
For who would bear the whips and scorns of Hollywood... (;-p)
I believe it is because everyone, even the guilty, have a right to some privacy. Yes, these criminals did something wrong, but although the "bad guys" on Dragnet were caught and for the most case, imprisoned for their crime, they also have the right to start over, once they have served their time and released.
Broadcasting their true names out over the airwaves would pretty much wreck that. (The real people the episodes were based on, probably had to deal with that enough anyway.) Once they had served their time, they had a right to start over, and it would be much harder, and possibly a violation of their civil rights to have their story broadcast.
The practice was in place also to protect their other family members -- let's say, for instance, the guy who conned everyone he came in contact with... Mr. Loomis? had a sister or brother that was a totally respectable, law abiding person. It would be horrible for them to have their brother's story dramatized on TV with his real name. Other's could not want to work with any of his relatives for fear on them doing something similar to them.
Make sense? Even in more modern times,people make concessions for this kind of thing. In Centennial, a miniseries back in the 70's changed the man who led the slaughter of a peaceful tribe of American Indians from Chivington to Skimmerhorn -- When Taylor Caldwell wrote The Captain's and the Kings, which was about the Kennedy family, she changed all the names, and when the story took place. I am sure there are other examples... like the fact that for the most part, when they have to have the President show up in a movie, they don't use a lookalike Obama, or Bush, or Regan. They use a totally made up president.
It is funny you should ask this... I have a dim memory of asking my mother pretty much the same question when the show ran originally, back in the late 60's and 70's.
How sad, that you were not born in my time, nor I, in yours.
Hi GF, thanks for the response. Yes, I can see how the families of criminals should be protected, but your argument that the criminals should be contradicts the "protect the innocent". If you were correct then they should say the names are changed to protect the innocent AND guilty. I think everyone hears this phrase without really contemplating what it means; at least we are among the few who do.
For who would bear the whips and scorns of Hollywood... (;-p)
You are missing the point altogether. By "the innocent," the producers mean themselves. The names have been changed to protect the producers, writers, network, actors ...
Wouldn't they have to get permission from the individuals if they used their real names? It would probably prevent them from using creative license on the stories as well - Otherwise l guess it would leave them open to lawsuits