Did they have sex?


SPOILERS

Did Martha and Nick have sex when the two were upstairs while George came home and Nick's wife was sleeping in the car?



reply


Did Martha and Nick have sex when the two were upstairs while George came home and Nick's wife was sleeping in the car?


They attempted to, in order to humiliate George, but Nick was too drunk to, uhm, perform.

reply

im pretty sure they do actually, hence nick being a "stud" and not a "houseboy".

"they should give nicole kidman an oscar for being able to show any emotion after THAT much botox".

reply

Martha: “Him can't. Him too full of booze.”

------

Wait a minute... who am I here?

reply

and then a minute later she admits that hes a "stud" and not a "houseboy", and thats why george walks out.

"they should give nicole kidman an oscar for being able to show any emotion after THAT much botox".

reply

Yup, just finished watching it. Martha plays her games with Blondie just like with George, so at first it seems like they haven't, but they did.

reply

Well I guess from the dialogue you can assume it was BAD sex...



------

Wait a minute... who am I here?

reply

Agreed, whatever happened between Martha and Nick didn't go well. But they still had sex.

BB ;-)

it's just in my humble opinion - imho -

reply

BAD sex? What's that?


That just goes to show you. You go someplace and there you are.

reply

I think that's what women sometimes experience?

reply

I watched it again last night. I think you're right. Martha eggs Nick on, but Nick couldn't, um, perform ("Too Drunk to ****," as the Dead Kennedys put it).

George mentions in one of his rants about the fictional son that Martha was "bringing strangers home at all hours of the day," which I interpret as Martha is a serial adulterer. George can't dump Martha because his career depends on his father-in-law's approval. Furthermore, George is a little lost baby-poo himself and couldn't face the world without Martha.

It's a pathetic sight the way George breaks down and sobs on the porch when he sees the silhouettes upstairs. If George was a "real man" on Martha's terms, not a wimpy cuckold, he would go up there and smash them both on the head. Either that, or he would drag Honey back to the car and have his way with her, just to say F.U. to Martha and Nick. But he doesn't, he just sits there, drunk and helpless, and takes it.

reply

I watched it again last night. I think you're right. Martha eggs Nick on, but Nick couldn't, um, perform ("Too Drunk to ****," as the Dead Kennedys put it).

George mentions in one of his rants about the fictional son that Martha was "bringing strangers home at all hours of the day," which I interpret as Martha is a serial adulterer. George can't dump Martha because his career depends on his father-in-law's approval. Furthermore, George is a little lost baby-poo himself and couldn't face the world without Martha.

It's a pathetic sight the way George breaks down and sobs on the porch when he sees the silhouettes upstairs. If George was a "real man" on Martha's terms, not a wimpy cuckold, he would go up there and smash them both on the head. Either that, or he would drag Honey back to the car and have his way with her, just to say F.U. to Martha and Nick. But he doesn't, he just sits there, drunk and helpless, and takes it.


Wow! Somebody on this thread actually understood the movie. I was shocked by how many people on this thread thought they actually had sex. I mean, even if you couldn't pick it up that his performance was a disappointment from the dialogue between Martha and Nick after the "sex" scene, one major theme of the play/movie is that marriage with a woman like Martha/Honey is an emasculating experience.

reply

Thanks. It's one of my favorites. I like to watch it again every once awhile because I always pick up on something new. The second half, IMO, is more of a horror movie than a comedy!

reply

Wow! Somebody on this thread actually understood the movie. I was shocked by how many people on this thread thought they actually had sex. I mean, even if you couldn't pick it up that his performance was a disappointment from the dialogue between Martha and Nick after the "sex" scene, one major theme of the play/movie is that marriage with a woman like Martha/Honey is an emasculating experience.


I thought it was fairly obvious that they did have sex. When Martha implies he didn't perform in bed, Nick gets offended. If Nick did not have sex because he was too drunk, he would have been embarassed, instead he acted like she was lying.

reply

George mentions in one of his rants about the fictional son that Martha was "bringing strangers home at all hours of the day," which I interpret as Martha is a serial adulterer. George can't dump Martha because his career depends on his father-in-law's approval. Furthermore, George is a little lost baby-poo himself and couldn't face the world without Martha.

It's a pathetic sight the way George breaks down and sobs on the porch when he sees the silhouettes upstairs. If George was a "real man" on Martha's terms, not a wimpy cuckold, he would go up there and smash them both on the head. Either that, or he would drag Honey back to the car and have his way with her, just to say F.U. to Martha and Nick. But he doesn't, he just sits there, drunk and helpless, and takes it.


George isn't as weak as he seems - witness his "get the guests" routine about Blondie and the Mouse, or his finally snapping and strangling Martha.

Taking away Martha's fantasy life about "her son" was far more powerful revenge for what she did than if he had punched her in the face or choked her again. It's pretty clear that George put up with the "son" fantasy to indulge Martha, and he realized that he had nothing to lose by taking it away from her at will. Perhaps he couldn't face the world without Martha, but it's strongly implied that she needed the warped emotional crutch of an imaginary son while he never wanted it.

In the scene where Nick says "I don't think [George] has a vertebra intact," Martha scoffs at him sarcastically and says that there's a lot he doesn't understand in this world. She knows that under his spineless facade, George can be as emotionally ruthless as she is.

reply

Also if any of the story about young George accidentally killing his parents is true his taking all Martha's vitriolic attacks makes perfect sense in that he feels he deserves to be miserable on some level. It may have also contributed to his not getting ahead in the academic world. Even if the entire episode was made up, just the fact that his father-in-law squelched his novel writing could result in George feeling depressed and trapped in a career he really didn't want.

reply

rofl about him not being able to perform!
yea I was under the impression he was a minute man.

-------------------------
wut I'ma do?

reply

I think it could be deeper!

I believe he could perform but it was Martha who declined it! remember she was devoted and loyal to George and so very very bitter too. Maybe the exxageration of "him cant him to full of booze" was a deterrent against the fact that she couldnt say "i never i too full of booze and repressed self loathing?" However she couldnt deny Nicks attraction to her! for it gave her a "one up" ;0) just a thought.

reply

Reading WAY too much into it, dear. Go re-watch the film or reread the play and it is very, very clear the two did NOT have sex.
Comprehension FAIL.

reply

Unfortunately Mike wished the screen adaption to be quite different to that of the play, okay the same script? but thrown from different perspectives. I`m not the only one who believes in my theory Kpocc, Elizabeth Taylor also leaked similar theory. But like most plays, movies, books, when the story isnt clear, its not meant to be and everyones perception is the right one and I for one agree with Liz`s my DEAR.

reply

"Leaked a similar theory". LOL. Now you're just making things up. Provide a citation (not speculation, an actual quote from Taylor).

You are flat-out wrong.

In addition, Albee has always controlled *any* production of his works with an iron fist, and has been known to yank the rights if he disagrees with a director's "vision".
He still does to this day, and he certainly wouldn't have permitted a first-time director to put another "spin" on his magnum opus.

It's not a matter of perception, we're not lying on a hill interpreting clouds.
Your "theory" is nothing more than your inability to understand the work.

reply

Oh dear! I see your quite emotional so this may mean a lot to you haha. Get out more! and remember sub-plots are in life not just scripts!! so whenever there`s a story a million people will find another in between those lines! Thats fact, you are disrespecting the writers of this movie by giving one-dimensional b&w theories of a complex nature. They wouldnt be very happy with your argument but am sure they would say your anxiety as concerning haha. Take a nap!

reply

LOL. Unfortunately for high art, there are always members of the hoi-polloi who mistake themselves for creative and insightful.
Go play some WoW and leave actual cultural discussions to those with the capacity to do so.

reply

High Art? you mean the type of art that is made to encourage the complexity of responses to its nature? thats high art! so youve contradicted yourself matey.

And what is WOW? haha. Is that some nerdy computer slang or game? so am betting your either a teenager or computer nerd haha.

And stop being so touchy, live a little! :0) you did not make this movie nor did you take any part in its birth, so let people have their own opinions! even the crew of this movie have their own personal interpretation, as does everybody when watching certain genres. The amount of interpretations in regards to say a Lynch movie is limitless so when it comes to an actual impression of life imitatating art the responses will always be mixed and complex, but hey...thats High Art ;0)

Now If your going to comment please be a little more neutral and happy haha as nobody`s out to get you kid! we just have are own thoughts and the world is always full of MAYBE! just MAYBE!? ;0)

reply

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

reply

Haha! thats more like it! I think we need some humour on this board. Hope I havent offended you at all. Gonna go get a power nap in myself ;0)

P xx

reply

>>> Reading WAY too much into it, dear

Person using terms like "dear" or "hun" to punctuate point = condescending


I cried because I had no shoes until I met a man with no sole. ~ Ancient Disco Proverb

reply

What is wrong with you? Your posts reveal a touchy, defensive snob. And you're acting like a jerk.

reply

They did the deed.

reply

Yes, they did have sex! She lied at first and said "no", but turns out he was a stud and not a houseboy. She lied a lot. But George was aware that sometimes Martha's skirt ends up over head after some drinks (she's probably cheated before- George says that there is bed hopping going on at the campus).

reply

Truth and illusion, my dear friends, truth and illusion...

Serve me the sky with a big slice of lemon

reply