One hears so much about her iconic beauty, but this film illustrates how much she relied on her name rather than her acting ability. Personally, I think it's like watching a stick insect with a daft accent, but I know it's each to their own, but it would be hard to argue against her very poor performance in this film.
It's easy to say that though, isn't it? She's such an icon no one dares criticise her acting ability, which was always fairly poor. You mention it and you get shouted down by people who admire her for other reasons and can't view her objectively.
So true. I've always thought she was a bad actress. And this movie is so campy they could have used a lovely hanger to show off the clothes while Peter O'Toole and the rest acted circles around it. Her face was remarkable and I've no doubt she was a good person who did good deeds but, acting? No ability whatsoever.
She is not a traditional dramatic actress, but I defy you to find any other actress that can combine naivety and vulnerability, with class and grace and still be likable. Not to mention her superb comedic timing.
It's not just about being a realistic character, for some characters were never meant to be realistic, it's about bringing what is necessary to the role.
You can call her campy in this role, but this movie is campy. Its an innocent, charming, entertaining matinee ----------- Beatles Song of the Day - http://twitter.com/BeatlesSotD
It's been speculated she had an affair with O'toole. I'm biased because I'm a huge Audrey fan. I even enjoyed "Robin and Marian" which some don't seem to care for.