How is this considered a trilogy?
When all the actors play different characters, the storylines don't connect, and they jump around in time?
I think I would have enjoyed it all a lot more if they had given "The Man With No Name" a connective story, where he plays the same character. And even if you argue that he did, Lee Van Cleef didn't, which is too bad, because I really liked his character from For A Few Dollars More. I think it would have been more enjoyable if he and Clint teamed up again for this movie against another bad guy and Tuco. Feels like a missed opportunity, but then again, maybe they didn't care about consistency as much in the 60s?