MovieChat Forums > Thunderball (1965) Discussion > This seems to be everyone's old favourit...

This seems to be everyone's old favourite movie and then they rewatch it


..years later and it's not as good as they remembered

I think i know why, On paper the story sounds awesome. You got a ransom demand in exchange for 2 nukes, classic bond moments like him playing chemin de fer, interacting with Q, not one but 3 hot bond girls, jet packs, DB5 etc.

But the editing for the most part is so bad..It's not Peter Hunt's fault, I believe he salvaged the best he could but it's still messy.

When the story gets to the Bahamas, each scene seems randomly put together. Bond only has 3 days to save the world but the scenes change from day to night over and over again.

It's so distracting it takes you out of the movie.

reply

I think the film could have done without a lot of superflous scenes. The film is overlong and bloated. The novel is pretty slimline.

"Perhaps he's wondering why someone would SHOOT a man before throwing him out of a plane..."

reply

I enjoy the film. I wonder why you feel the need to act like everyone hates it now just because you do.

- - - - - - -
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?

reply

It always makes me laugh when a poster says "everyone hates" a film when they are probably thinking that just b\c they, and maybe their lone buddy, don't like it. Thunderball is long a complaint often heard but it's runninh time is just 2:15. Most Bond films are 2 hours + (Die Another Day is 2:15, Licence To Kill is 2:15, etc.) It's not my favorite but I've grown to love it more over the years. My favorites are From Russia With Love and Goldfinger, followed closely by Dr. No. Thunderball is close behind. Yes, the boat crash scene is silly but that can't be said to ruin an altogether good 007 flick.

reply

"It`s so distracting it takes you out of the movie".

Only if you`re actively looking to nit pick on stuff. And then `anything` can be distracting.



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

For me, Thunderball got better upon rewatch.

But I agree its slower and more "bloated" than its predecessors, in some ways. But still, its also stylish and atmospheric and epic in a way its leaner, meaner, less "superstarish" predecessors were. So there's value in that too. When one is busy reacting to why it isn't like what one expected, then one can miss out on appreciating what's been provided instead. So for me, the rewatch helped that.

Now, this is a signature gun, and that is an optical palm reader.

reply

When one is busy reacting to why it isn't like what one expected, then one can miss out on appreciating what's been provided instead.
I couldn't agree more with this, and it doesn't just go for watching films.




http://rateyourmusic.com/~JrnlofEddieDeezenStudies

reply

I am formerly known as HillieBoliday......Member Since May 2006:

I saw this in it's initial theatre release back in the 1960's.......was crazy about it then..........and here I am 49 years later...still crazy about it and I watch it over and over!

Back then we didn't have the luxury of comparing this movie with anything else, because it was innovative in a lot of areas of film making.

I really appreciate the simplicity in contrast to the CGI crap that we are force-fed on a daily basis!

And I feel honored that I've been able to watch technology change....where as some of our younger generation don't have the respect nor the appreciation for being able to reference where the technology they enjoy today started from!

"OOhhhooo....I'M GON' TELL MAMA!"

reply

Used to be my favorite Bond movie, but now maybe it's #4 behind Goldfinger, from Russia With Love and You Only Live Twice.

One thing is for sure, Thunderball is 10x better than that turd Never Say Never Again.

reply

Not one of my favorites, either. Watching it right now, I feel it’s too much underwater stuff that takes away from the screen time of our hero. But as I watch I smile thinking of how much Austin Powers got from this one in particular. My favorites: Goldfinger, View to a Kill, Dr. No, From Russia, Moonraker. Not in that order, but Goldfinger is first.

reply

[deleted]

In general, I agree with you. This really should have been the best Connery Bond movie. I still think it's the best written.

Unfortunately, uneven direction and some of the worst editing of any Bond movie sunk it. Suddenly speeding the film up 3x during some shots was really jarring to watch. Another poster also pointed out how badly the lighting and film quality changes between shots in the same scene in several places.

I wonder what this movie would have been like with a different director and editor (and I'll slap anyone who suggests that would be Never Say Never).

_____________________
I'm your Huckleberry.

reply