MovieChat Forums > Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (1964) Discussion > Don't subject your kids to the Christmas...

Don't subject your kids to the Christmas-crushing despair of Rudoph the Red-Nosed Reindeer


https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/12/rankin-bass-rudolph-the-red-nosed-reindeer/616932/

"For more than half a century, generations of children have taken the show, which debuted in 1964, into their hearts, and for just about as long, I’ve been trying to avoid it," says Caitlin Flanagan. "From my earliest days, the special produced in me only a fretful anxiety, leading to an eventual refusal to watch it. I couldn’t really explain the problem. I knew only that the show didn’t make me feel very Christmassy. There’s a lot in Rudolph that people don’t seem to remember. At one point, the Abominable Snowmonster tries to murder Rudolph in front of his parents by smashing a giant stalactite on his head. As our gentle hero lies facedown, concussed and unresponsive, his own girlfriend—the beautiful, long-lashed Clarice—wonders aloud why the snowman won’t put the little reindeer out of his misery: 'Why doesn’t he get it over with?' This was Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, not The Third Man. Meanwhile, back at Santa’s workshop—a phrase that should connote only the jolliest of associations—a dark tale is unfolding. Santa, it turns out, presides over a nonunion shop where underproducing elves are deprived of breaks and humiliated; they dream not of Christmas, but of escape. Poorly constructed toys are thrown onto a bare and frozen island, where they cry and wander. How long have they been there? A year? A thousand years? One of the toys, A Dolly for Sue, looks perfectly fine—why has she been stuck with the misfits? Rankin finally admitted the nature of Dolly’s flaw in 2005, when he revealed that she suffered from 'psychiatric problems'” The Island of Misfit Toys, it turns out, is but another atoll in the gulag archipelago." Rudolph, says Flanagan, "is a beautiful show, a bright box full of toys that have come to life," but it's also the work of a grieving man, copywriter Robert May, whose wife died of cancer while he was working on it as a Christmas story for Montgomery Ward. That's why she says it "contains a powerful evocation of loneliness."

reply

The Left ruins everything

reply



That's clearly a satire piece John..

EDIT: Giving this some more thought, I guess "clearly" may have been harsh. The reason it's not so clear is that even the best satire is often no competition for reality these days. Years ago, news stories from the satire Onion News Networks were funny even if the stories were clearly humorously contrived. Today, we have people calling Christmas songs date-rape songs. The first time I heard that charge, I laughed at the silliness of it. I then wept for humanity when I not only found out the charge was legitimate, but that an awful lot of people agreed with it.

So while it's not "clearly" satire, it is. I mean, no one's that f***ked up....

reply

That's your take-away ??Idiot. LOL

reply

Santa, it turns out, presides over a nonunion shop where underproducing elves are deprived of breaks and humiliated; they dream not of Christmas, but of escape.


LOL, you have to admit that's pretty clever.

For another take on this timeless classic, check out this gem from Mad TV:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icjh6wGUUfE

reply

The author who wrote this article can go stuff it. I'll happily watch this at Christmas-time and let my kids watch it too, regardless of what some bitter, sad, hateful person wrote on The Atlantic.

reply

I have epilepsy and I don't see it as a bad film at all. Infact because the world has changed so much since 1964 for people with disabilities, it's one of my favirotes.

I understood people with disabilities (the toys) used to 'segregated away' for 'their own good' but that deinstitutionalization was also starting when this film was made. It is explaining using animation why deinstutionalization is 'good'

Of course it does not explain that misfits need more than to be 'played with' by somebody lol. They need food, medicine, money...etc. And sufficient/appropriate kinds too. But 'basic needs are explained in play/imaginary terms which a child can comprehend

The toys on the island are successfully liberated from their isolation and integrated with the other toys at the end of the film. They get to play with the children and other toys--who are not misfits.

This makes them happy.

Presumably there will be no more misfit toys and the 'institution' on that island (like many others in real life) will close.

The film becomes harder to comprehend because it was made in 1964. This means civil rights laws work. People expect intergration of people with disabilities now.

reply