So I don’t know were the produces get of by calling this movie the fall of the Roman Empire.
What did Edward Gibbon get when he called his books The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire?
As the opening narration states and Finlay Currie's character in the senate emphasize, the film doesn't see the end of the Roman Empire as being of the literal kind. It doesn't literally end with all the buildings razed to the ground but it ends with Caesar's throne being auctioned.
So who out of the two actors (James Mason and Alec Guinness) gave the better performance?
Guinness easily. James Mason is sort-of wasted as Timonides save for that wonderful scene in the senate and his attempt at "diplomacy" with the Goths. Whereas Guinness gives a stunning performance as Marcus Aurelius, deeply tragic and also unsentimental and tough like when he essentially sells his own daughter to the Armenian kings so as to beef more troops at his border.
"Ça va by me, madame...Ça va by me!" - The Red Shoes
reply
share