Talos was 2 miles high!!


Loved the movie as a kid and still enjoy it to this day, what always amused me was the apparant size of Talos when he stands over the exit to the bay.

http://img520.imageshack.us/i/talos3ng4.jpg

Obviously this is due to perspective but he is huge (note the cliffs either side) compared to the normal size Talos on the beach (http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Mythology/Talos.html.....scroll down a bit).

I'm not nitpicking though, would have been amusing if Talos was that size to start with which would have made him even more scary! I suppose you can say the ship is out of proportion when he picks it up as well, akin to a large aircraft carrier using the cliffs as a reference point!..... (http://monsterarchives.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mmm&action=di splay&thread=625

Anyway i'd take these effects anyday over some of the cgi crap that we're forced to put up with these days

If you never fail, you're not trying hard enough

reply


Well, he WAS pretty big. Well over 100 feet tall, I'd say. Maybe closer to 200 feet.

Ozy

And I stood where I did be; for there was no more use to run; And again I lookt with my hope gone.

reply

Yikes! It's the American Godzilla of '63!

Anyway, I got this CG hate in the '90s, but now? Really? I agree that it's less charming, but it is fairly impressive nowadays, and it allows for spectacles that wouldn't be humanly possible any other way.

---
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

reply

CGI is worse than ever now, not due to it's quality, but due to the attitude of the studios that it is all that matters and is the first order of business, with story and everything else coming in a far second. Sadly, the ability to do anything has robbed current film makers of the need to rely on the things that made movies great to start with...characters, performances, editing, atmosphere, and story. So yes, it is an even bigger scourge now than it was back in the day. It's a great tool, but sadly it is abused by those behind the camera who lack the talent to be the same level of directors as those who were limited in what could be shown by the technologies available to them, forcing them to instead rely on other tools of the movie making trade. Simply put, just because it can be shown doesn't mean that it must be shown.

- - - - - - -
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?

reply

The Taos scene is my favorite scene. I have watched this movie many times and I never made the comparison nor noticed the inconsistency in his size in the movie. It dosn't matter. It was still beautifully done and was perfect in my book. Talos was just HUGE irregardless. Too bad for Hylas. That spear/broach pin was NOT that important. But then again, he did it out of loyalty for Hercules.

reply

Me, too. I saw this with my father as a kid. When the bronze giant, Talos, creaking, turned his head with its empty eye sockets towards Hylas and Hercules, I was terrified. When he picked up the boat, it looked like a toy in his hands. Talos was my favorite menace in this film.
In one version of the myth, Talos grabbed his victim and sat down in a fire,embracing him in his arms and roasting the hapless prey to death.

I could be a morning person if morning happened at noon.

reply

In some of the "Extra" stuff I've seen, Ray Harryhausen discusses the effects old style VS computer generated and says he thinks the old style models and stop motion was maybe more dreamlike and terrifying than the computer stuff. I agree the scale seemed off from scene to scene, but that would make Talos more nightmarish as an image that seemed HUGE but to have no distinct size. It's a subtle thing that makes it more scary. Talos was created and filmed to evoke terror from a smaller being and I think this was done VERY WELL!!!! I saw this movie in a theater when it was released and still love it!!!!!!!!!!

reply