MovieChat Forums > The Fugitive (1963) Discussion > A better ending for the series?

A better ending for the series?


I always thought the very end of 'The Judgment' could have been just a little more satisfying. I used to joke that instead of shaking Gerard's hand, Kimble should have slugged and decked the guy who made his life a living hell for four years. Failing that, I would have liked to see a close-up of a conflicted Gerard, who now has to live with the knowledge of the wrongfulness of his obsession.

But Barry Morse's passing made me realize what the greatest lost opportunity was: Realizing Kimble's innocence and what his obsession has cost him and Kimble, he should have taken a bullet or in some other way sacrificed his own life to save Kimble from the one-armed man! The poetic justice would have brought the series full circle: beginning with a woman's murder, it would have ended with the person most obsessed with bringing the killer to justice committing the ultimate act of atonement for pursuing an innocent man.

reply

Gerard taking a bullet for Kimble would've been a good idea. Then, show Gerard dying while he tells Kimble how sorry he was. Kimble slugging Gerard, though? No. TV was a lot different back then. Good guys on TV still respected authority figures back then. Would it work if the Fugitive was a TV series today, though? Certainly.

reply

Kimble slugging Gerard was just a gag... however, Kimble does knock SEVERAL policemen unconscious in the course of making his escapes, at least in the first DVD package; once he was exonearted, Kimble probably had several assault charges waiting for him around the country.

A Fugitive series today? I gave up on the '90s remake about 15 minutes into the first episode - Tim Daly was just boring, not an iota of the empathy that made Janssen's performance so compelling.

FUGITIVE REMAKE SPOILER BELOW:






Talking about Gerard taking a bullet, in the last episode of the remake (according to a friend who followed it) during a showdown between Kimble and Gerard someone unseen shoots Gerard; cliffhanger to never be continued...

reply

The ending was perfection and so was the entire series. Kimball has taken on a life in this world.

reply

I liked the ending ... from the moment Kimble and Gerrard head to the amusement park, it's fantastic, and everything I'd hoped it would be.

The rest of the episode was a bit of a letdown. (Not too much -- just a bit.) I never liked J.D. Cannon as Chandler, and I didn't like the actress who played his wife. They just seemed to wimpy and dippy.

If I had to change anything, it would have been neat if Kimble's brother-in-law turned out to be the real killer, and Johnson only witnessed it. That would have been one heck of a surprise. But it may have been unsatisfying -- I think everyone wanted to see that final showdown with the One Armed Man.

reply

I liked the ending, too. Especially the Kimble/Gerard handshake at the end. I agree it would've been more dramatic to have Gerard catch a bullet, but the handshake was touching, especially when Barry Morse smiles at David Janssen as if to say "I was wrong and I'm sorry". Excellent!

One thing that has always struck me as amusing was when Johnson climbed the tower in his attempt to get away. Why would a killer do that? Especially one with only one arm! That happened a lot on those old police shows. If there was a tower around, you could bet some criminal would try to get away by climbing it. Always a hoot!

reply

A lot of Johnson's actions in the finale don't make sense, aside from climbing the tower. Why would he think killing Kimble would get him off the hook? Also, trying to blackmail a man who witnessed you committing a murder is not a very smart move. I realize that they were trying to tease viewers with the possibility that Johnson was the witness and Chandler the killer, but still.

reply

The blackmail plot was designed by the bail bondsman, and Johnson just stole it from him. It is hard to believe that Johnson would have come up with the plot on his own. Johnson does not make a lot of smart moves. I imagine that the law enforcement in small town Indiana is fairly tough, yet, that is where he goes to commit breakins of occupied houses, arguably not the most lucrative crime he could have selected, but one with ample risk to the criminal.

reply

Yes, the bail bondsman did come up with the blackmail plot, but that was based on his assumption that whoever bailed Johnson out of jail was the real killer and that Johnson could identify him.

reply

I used to watch the show when it was first-run... but by the 4th season, I got bored with the fact that the "main" plot was touched on less and less, and never seemed to get anywhere. By the most incredible stroke of luck, I just happened to tune the show back in one night, wondering what they were up to... and discovered they were doing the SERIES FINALE. No way I was gonna miss the following week-- and I didn't!


Despite the long-stated opinion of Roy Huggins, it was RIGHT for them to have done a finale. He argued viewers would not want to watch again in reruns, since they knew the ending. I say, WHO wants to watch reruns of a show where they NEVER FINISHED the story??? Any series built around one "BIG STORY" should have a beginning, middle... AND ENDING. (THE PRISONER also had an ending... of sorts... and so did GILLIGAN'S ISLAND... even if it took 10 years to get made.)


In the 80's I taped all 120 episodes off of PBS. The show actually gave me recurring nightmares, as I found myself relating to Kimble's personality too much... and Gerard reminded me of my Dad! (yikes)


When I finally got to the LAST episode again, I was very surprised. Although most of the section in the amusement park was clear in my memory, I had completely forgotten everything else! The J.D. Cannon character seemed completely out of left field. Instead of a build-up, the final story, which was done abruptly, after-the-fact, when they found out the series was NOT coming back for a 5th season, seemed rather contrived to me. And it was absolutely MADDENING that Gerard, who obviously by this time KNEW without any doubt in his mind that Kimble was innocent, STILL would not change his tune until the witness actually ADMITTED that he had seen the murder. Mind-boggling!




More on topic for this thread... I always recall a story my Dad told me from when the show was still first-run. There was a rumor going around where he worked-- an awful lot of people he knew also watched the show-- that GERARD was really the killer, and that the whole time he chased Kimble it was because he wanted to make sure the guy wouldn't be proven innocent. (Of course, it was only a rumor...!)

reply

[deleted]

Revisedandexpanded, Betsy Chandler WAS SUPPOSED to be mentally ill, so of course she had to be a bit dippy! I thought she was excellent.

The problem with your picking Richard Anderson as a better killer of Helen Kimble is the fact that his character was played by no less than TWO other actors--James Sikking and Lyn McCarthy. AND Anderson also played in at least 3 other episodes, so it would have drawn attention to those, shall we say, "inconsistencies of casting".

reply

From a TV Guide article written just before The Judgement aired, David Janssen had his own idea of an ending:

From TV Guide, August 19, 1967
Actually, the best ending--one that will never go before any camera--was improvised by Janssen himself a year or so ago. Constantly plagued by interviewers wanting to know if the One-Armed Man did it, David retaliated in kind. "Yes, but don't tell a soul", he replied.

"It goes like this: Kimble, cleared of the murder, retires to a desert island to recuperate from his ordeal. At sunset he takes a swim. Just before plunging into the surf, he pauses, unscrews his wooden arm, and tosses it on the sand. Fade-out."

reply

An ending where Kimble is really guilty would be a tremendous letdown. Knowing he was innocent and seeing how decent he was every week intensified the drama. Viewers could sympathize with an innocent man on the run with his life at stake. Had he been guilty it would have made dupes out of everyone that cheered him on for four seasons. Although it would have been an ironic ending worthy of the Twilight Zone, it would have ruined the series for future generations. The show is still as good as it was back then because of a terrific ending that brought closure. Too many shows get cancelled before they can wrap up the loose ends.

reply

AND...it also would have ruined the political position behind the show--one of the biggest anti-death penalty shows ever to run on television. As a matter of fact, this show "molded" my generation (Boomers) into being liberals/anti-death penalty folks probably more than any other show.

reply

I'm pro-death penalty. I've seen a number of episodes and it hasn't changed my view of the issue.

reply

I agree

reply

I disagree. The ending was a real let-down for a number of reasons.

1) Kimble's brother, played by Andrew Prine in "Home Is The Hunted", is never seen again. What happened to him? Did he die? Wouldn't (given his feelings for Kimble having been repaired at the end of "Home Is The Hunted") he be there for his brother's acquittal? I mean, c'mon now!

2) There would have been TONS of media vehicles outside the courtroom building and lots of people outside who couldn't get into the (we have to assume) crowded courtroom.

3) NONE of the court visitors coming out with Kimble--save for his sister, nephew Billy and brother-in-law--were is any of the previous episodes. Can't we assume that Helen's father (played by Lloyd Gough), Helen's sister (played by Louise Sorrel) and possibly even Helen's mother (played by Ruth White) would just possibly be there to apologize (Ruth White, esp.) to him for wanting him dead? And how about a trail of lovely women--starting with Vera Miles (first episode), Susan Oliver ("Never Wave Goodbye"), Suzanne Pleshette (loved him in both episodes she was in), Lois Nettleton, Elizabeth Allen (well, she loved him in ONE episode we're told in the end), Mexican Carol Lawrence (who definitely loved him and would have had Arthur Hill's money to fly to the states to be there as Hill died in "Death Of A Very Small Killer"), Diana Hyland (who most definitely loved him in "Dossier On A Diplomat"), Ruta Lee ("Angels Travel On Lonely Roads") and many others. You'd think that at least SOME of these would have made the effort to come to the hearing which we assume was days later after Morse shoots the one-armed man. And how about all the great friends he made along the way...like the father and kids in the walnut fields of CA in "The 2130", Charles Aidman and son Tommy Rettig and bus passenger who warns him not to go back to Stafford, Jim Nolan all from "Trial By Fire", Pat Hingle as the gossip columnist in "Search In A Windy City", Steve McNally and the Apache co-workers along with Nan Martin as Congresswoman Snell from "The Iron Maiden", R.G. Armstrong as the Sheriff and the little girl in "All The Scared Rabbits", teens Donald Losby and Diane Ramey and maybe even Edward Binns from "Cry Uncle", Dean Jagger from "Right In The Middle Of The Season", Barbara Baxley from "Nobody Ever Loses All The Time" who owes Kimble an apology for not believing him about her lover, the one-armed man along with nurse Joanna Moore (who loved him), Telly Savalas' wife Carol Rossen from "God Have Mercy", James Daly (who prosecuted Kimble) and wife Joanne Linville, Betty Garrett from "Escape Into Black", Melvyn Douglas (whose character certainly could have afforded to fly in) and daughter from "The 2130", John Fiedler from "The End Game", the entire townof Northoak including Sheriff Frank Overton and wife Nancy Wickwire, Barbara Barrie from "The End Is But The Beginning" whose life he saved, Janice Rule, the aggressive reporter who helped him catch the one-armed man in "Wife Killer", Ed Begley from "Man In A Chariot", Lyn McCarthy as the Warden in "Wings Of An Angel" along with Lane Brandbury whose life he saved, his college buddy William Windom and wife Geraldine Brooks from "The Ivy Maze" and probably Howard de Sylva from "Death Is The Door Prize" along with plenty of others whose lives he saved or changed for the better. Granted, some of these actors played other characters in other episodes, often as antagonists so it might seem strange to have them at the hearing--but in what capacity? And yes, it would have cost a lot to have these many actors at Kimble's hearing/release but a bunch of nobodies from Stafford was a real letdown for me. Of all these characters, I can't imagine that reporter Janice Rule wouldn't have been there.

4) Did any of you wonder "why" the police weren't called to the closed amusement park after so many shots--including loud rifle shots--were fired? The police would have swarmed over the place! Granted, Morse had to be the one to kill the one-armed man but still...

reply

Yes, Gerard should've been shot and that would lead to a teary finale where he dies in Kimble's arms...
Or, less sentimental, go and drown himself like his literary ancestor. He had the reason...

reply

No, a better ending would have been Gerard being so haunted by what he's done to Kimble that he resigns from the police force, gets a law degree, and spends the rest of his life defending those who have been falsely accused.

Not to mention that it would have made a great spinoff.

reply

The ending is fine as it is.

I just wish Gerard would have apologized for not believing his story and calling him a liar so many times (at least in the first 2 seasons he did, I haven't seen the last 2 seasons except for The Judgment).
He would then say he was only doing his job.

reply

Well, in a sense he did, when he was telling the witness how they'd both made an innocent man suffer for so long.

reply

Yeah, I know.

But after the court hearing freeing Kimble would have been much better.

reply

According to Mr. Morse (another of those great British actors who played an American role flawlessly!) there was to be dialogue between Kimble and Gerard outside the courthouse, but it just seemed awkward and clunky. They realized it just worked better with the wordless handshake--which, in the end, contained all the apology and forgiveness needed.

I like to think this whole thing *would* cause Gerard to take a good, hard look at himself and the way he saw "justice." Not so much as to change careers, but to have a better understanding of the spirit of the law and not just the letter. And, unlike his literary father, he wouldn't have to flippin' KILL HIMSELF over it.

reply

The simple handshake (symbolic apology) was more in keeping with the film noir feel of the series. In a small way, it's unfortunate that the series went to color for it's last season. The 4th season spent more money on production values (in addition to the color) which did sacrifice quality (story wise) in some 4th season stories. Now fortunately, at least to me, they ended the series on a very high note. Also remember, it was unusual for a series to even HAVE a conclusion at all back then. One other series which DID have a conclusion was "The Life & Legend of Wyatt Earp".

reply

I would've watched that show. Neat idea.

reply

To have Donna's husband turn out to be a man who would both betray his wife and then try to facilitate her brother's death would have been devastating to Donna (Kimble's sister), and would have meant that Kimble, Donna, (and the fans!) would not have experienced the complete joy of Kimble's exoneration. You just can't break Donna's heart. It would also have been a complete turnaround for Len's character as portrayed for 4 years, and therefore a slap in the face to loyal fans who would have interpreted this as just a cheap gimmick inserted for shock value. That's not what The Fugitive was about.

reply

Of course, Donna's husband turned out to be three different actors during the run of the show: in season one, it was James B. Sikking (Hill Street Blues); in season three, it was Lin McCarthy; and in the finale, it was Richard Anderson (Six Million Dollar Man).

reply

I think at least 4 different actors played Kimble's brother-in-law over the course of the series, one of whom was James Sikking who later played the gung-ho SWAT team commander on Hill Street Blues.

Sorry for the delayed reply - I had no idea my thread was still active 4+ years later!

reply

Sorry, you're wrong, jlstretch! The brother-in-law was played by THREE actors, not four...Sikking, McCarthy and Anderson.

reply

Only three? I'll never be able to look at myself in the mirror again! I humbly surrender my King of The Fugitive trivia crown to you - well played, sir!

reply

A terrific post!

reply

A better ending would have been a huge scrum of the women who loved Kimble all turning up outside court and chasing the poor man down the street.

reply

HAHAHAHA!! A terrific reply!

reply

A better ending would have Kimble's wife faking her death and having an affair with Lt. Gerard

So, to sum it up in legal terminology: Get lost, you bum.

reply

An earlier poster said that by the time of the finale, Gerard knew Kimble was innocent but wouldn't act any differently until he heard the witness officially say so.

The point in the episode was, Gerard by this time DID know Kimble was innocent. However, he was legally unable to do anything about it. He may have now believed Kimble's story but it wasn't anything he could take to the DA or a judge to try and reverse the conviction. If no witness had come forward, the best he could have done for Kimble was to let his escape again, if Kimble wanted to do that. (One got the sense that Kimble was tired of the pursuit as well, and wanted it to end one way or the other.)

In what he said, that he and the witness had put an innocent man through hell for four years was his admitting that he felt guilt about it. The difference between him and Javert, of course, was that Javert hounded a man who had already paid his debt to society (for the theft of a loaf of bread) over minor infractions. Gerard was pursuing a fugitive from justice who was believed to have committed murder (and thus was considered highly dangerous).

reply

[deleted]

I saw 'The Judgment' back in 67 and was thrilled to see RK punching out the OAM.

In the intervening years, all I remembered was the amusement park sequence.

Upon several more recent viewings, I felt 'The Judgment' was a bit lacking and the JDCannon situation rather forced.

The very end was too weak. The handshake was fine, but the "hey" "hey" was useless.

What I wanted to see was as that police car pulls up to the curb and the cops get out and RK hesitates for a moment...I wanted to see the cops say, "Hello, Dr. Kimble. Nice day." or something like that. And he could have responded in kind, "Yes, nice day Very nice" A bit trite, but better than what they gave us.

Maybe they can dub that in! :)

reply

The ending was fine, except, at the very end they should have shown David Janssen unscrew his fake arm......

reply

Old joke, old joke! (But still funny :-)) )

reply

I watched the final episodes back in 1967 as a teenager. The presence of the J.D. Cannon character RUINED what should been a great ending for one the best TV shows ever. Kimble should just hunted down Fred Johnson at the amusement park, won the fight, and dragged Johnson down to where Gerard was standing (alone) and threatened or beat a detail oriented confession out of Johnson, a confession with details only the killer would know. Then Kimble picks up Johnson and shoves him into Gerard's arms and walks away. THEN they could done the same epilog.

reply

J.D. Cannon's character was very much contrived and came out of nowhere. I never found his "explanation" believable. But the problem with beating a confession out of Johnson is that a confession under duress would be tossed out of court.

I think they squandered a much better ending a couple of years earlier. I don't recall the name of the episode, but a military officer came forward as a witness. He had seen the one-armed man as he ran out of Kimble's house and was nearly hit by Kimble. But he left for an overseas tour the next day and was unaware of the significance of what he had seen until he returned a few years later. Now that would have worked much better.

reply

Yeah that was a very good episode with Charles Aidman as the witness and Tommy Rettig (first child star to appear on Lassie) as his son. Aidman's testimony was compromised because he had a substance abuse problem as I recall.I agree that would have been a lot better ending episode without the drug abuse of course.

I realize that a beaten confession from Johnson would not hold up in court but if Johnson gave unpublicized details of the murder in front of Gerard and then Gerard testified to that effect I THINK that would be enough

reply

As for whether the court would allow it, I guess we'll need a lawyer for that. But even if it were allowed, would that be enough to give the jury reasonable doubt of Kimble's guilt?

Setting aside this case, and our bias for Kimble because we know he's innocent, take an ordinary murder case. The defense argues that John Doe over here confessed while the defendant was beating him up. If I'm on the jury, I can well imagine the defendant grabbing some random poor slob off the street, telling him a detail of the crime and then saying, "OK, now we're going over to that cop over there and you're going to confess and mention this detail, or I'm going to beat the living **** out of you." If that's all you've got, I don't think that's enough to give me reasonable doubt.

reply

I saw the series ending when it first aired back in 1967. I just resaw it tonight and just forgot about the Chandler character being the witness in the murder. However, I did remember the tower scene. The circumstance surrounding Chandler and his past interaction with Johnson did seem to be a bit hokey. His reason for providing bail money just to cover up his past actions (or inaction) seemed a bit flimsy to me. The "flashback" scene of the murder also did not look quite logical. It gave me the impression that Chandler was concocting a lie to his wife. They could have written a better series ending, in my opinion.

But, I did like the earlier suggestion for the series to end with the throngs of women from the past episodes who fell in love with Richard Kimble (like Janice Rule's character from a few episodes earlier) to show up at the courthouse when he was exonerated. That would have ended the series on a rather uncomfortable tone for Dr. Kimble. Lt. Gerard would say to Kimble outside the courthouse with something like "If you think I was chasing you was bad, you haven't seen nothing yet".

William Conrad's last words at the epilog says that the running for Kimble stopped on September 5. If the series ending aired at the end of August, why is there a reference to a date in September?

reply

CCsito: William Conrad's last words at the epilog says that the running for Kimble stopped on September 5. If the series ending aired at the end of August, why is there a reference to a date in September?
Refer to the thread "Why different dates for 'The day the running stopped'?"

reply

Any chance you can provide a URL for that thread? I have no idea how to find it on my own. Thanx!

reply

Discussion on the different dates in the final narration:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056757/board/nest/222002134?ref_=tt_bd_1

reply

***Beware of Spoilers***

The ending was very good. I remember watching it back in 1967 when I was a first grader. The Fugitive was the first TV show I recall watching and my family watched it together (the red tower where the final action takes place remains vivid in my mind). We were excited to know that the series had an ending and that the hated one-armed man would finally get his just reward.

It should be noted that in that episode Girard admits to Chandler (J.D. Cannon) that the two of them have made Kimble's life "a living hell."

The idea of Girard chasing Kimble down because the policeman was the REAL killer is a pretty interesting idea, one that has served as a plot before. The real boomerang of such an interesting idea would be that the whole time Kimble was, himself, chasing an innocent man! To have the one-armed man (yeah, yeah I know the cat's name was Fred Johnson, he'll always be the one-armed man to me) running from Kimble because where Kimble went Girard went makes it a lulu of an existential daisy chain. It keeps Girard a predator, one-armed man prey and turns Kimble both prey and predator. How's that for irony?

An additional sleazy noir paperback twist to the tale would have been to have Girard and Helen Kimble engaged in an affair. The one-armed man -- a peeping tom -- caught the breakup of that romance or broke in to steal the silverware and got a handful of trouble instead. a good idea, but not one that would fly on 1967 television. My parents would not have let my seven-year old eyes watch that trash!

reply

I have to disagree. Cannon's character was essential.

I wouldn't have wanted any pussyfooting around with the ending. Not someone seeing the one-armed man coming out of the house. Someone actually seeing the murder. Saying "I saw that man, Fred Johnson, kill Helen Kimble." No doubt. Kimble had suffered enough. The ending had to be without a doubt.

Cannon's character also is a way to get the one-armed man to come back to Stafford with the hope of a big payoff. Unless you want Gerard to bring them both back and there's some hokey escape. No more hokey escapes.

I also don't think a one-armed man confession would have been credible given prior episodes. He would only confess under physical punishment and would simply recant later. Didn't want to see that either.

Cannon's character also gives the audience someone to hate other than Gerard. Gerard himself could have been saved four years if this guy would have just come forward. Gerard gets hated by Kimble's family earlier in the episode, now it's finally his turn to release his frustrations. That's what Cannon is there for.

Just so many great, visceral moments in the finale for Gerard and Kimble that couldn't have happened without Cannon's character.

Also, Gerard did save Kimble's life when the one-armed man was winning the fight on the tower, so that evened the score a bit between them.

As far as people questioning why the one-armed man climbed the tower, a very early episode had a line, when Gerard was chasing Kimble, about instinct dictating upward flight. It was a nice callback (probably inadvertent given the era.)

reply