The ,,Teenage'' Daughters of Zebulon Prescott ...
... were respectively 32 and 31 when this movie made its premiere. Who had the big idea of casting Baker and Reynolds as adolescent girls?
share... were respectively 32 and 31 when this movie made its premiere. Who had the big idea of casting Baker and Reynolds as adolescent girls?
share[deleted]
I'm guessing it was so they could 'age' more naturally. Besides, would you have wanted Jimmy Stewart to marry someone even younger???
shareBaker was superb: she played young and middle aged very well.
shareHaha, good remark about Stewart there. And I think you're right about the aging. If they would've casted a 20-something year old, they couldnt have gotten her to look like Reynolds did in that last scene.
shareWell Debbie Reynolds was paedomorphic so she was easily cast as a teenager in the film and Carroll Baker was a good actress. And 32 and 31 are not exactly old so it isn't too much of a stretch in the first place.
"Namu-myoho-renge-kyo"
Well Debbie Reynolds was paedomorphic
Did you even read the explanation? "Paedomorphic" means she had a body that could PASS for a child's. It doesn't mean she's a pedophile, and no sane person believes she is.
BTW, slander is spoken, libel is written. If someone did write in this forum that someone else is a pedophile and it's not true, then that would be libel.
Did you even read the explanation? "Paedomorphic" means she had a body that could PASS for a child's. It doesn't mean she's a pedophile, and no sane person believes she is.
Would never have guessed that Baker was 32...wow. Thought she was early 20s.Then again, it wasn't HD. She looked more convincing young then old lol.
She looked already way way younger than Stewart.
Eve's father says she's 20 years old.
share