cool65triumphrider wrote:
I didn't know that the first M-16's didn't have cleaning gear, but they sure had the habit of binding up with the bolt open. The only solution for that (because it can't be disassembled with the bolt open) was to pound the muzzle on something solid (rock, tree) to drive the bolt home. Figured that one out all by myself:-0
The M-16A1 with the "forward assist" was a fine improvement; a button to beat on in hope it would drive the bolt forward.. simply an attempt to treat the symptom and ignore the disease.
Part of the reason for the problems with the early M-16's were the fact that while Stoner realized the importance of a chromed chamber, McNamara didn't. In an effort to cut costs, and because any reason given for the application didn't jive with McNamara's reasoning, he ordered that all production M-16's NOT have their chambers chromed.
...jams ensued, as we're all painfully aware.
The cleaning kits were the "Band-Aid" cure for that problem, as soldiers were instructed to clean their weapon often.
Eventually, the chambers were chromed and the gun became much more reliable.
Another problem was misfires.
This was actually a factor of the gunpowder that was used in the rounds.
The cartridges all used ball powder in the early days.
Ball powder is susceptible to moisture, in the right conditions.
A change to stick powder solved that.
At one time, it was hypothesized that the ammo was loaded by Winchester, and since their gunpowder is mostly ball powder, this was the reason for using that type.
Re: U.S. Army Grease Gun - The addition of the 9mm barrel conversion, the change in the magazine and the omission of the charging handle are the differences between the M3 and the M3A1.
There was a large and effective silencer for that gun as well, but I believe that was a mid production adaptation to the M3.
Tell me, you love your country?
Well, I've just died for it.
reply
share